Be The Voice - Gen1Rev22

Saturday, 18 February 2012

Have you the brains to work this out ?

Let us look at how cunning and deceptive the pied pipers of evolutionary paradigm are and how subtle is their war against The Supernatural Creator of The Universe with all of the order , laws and complexity we OBSERVE ......

The following words with reference to the human brain are from an article in Scientific American :
‘the most complex structure in the known universe, complex enough to coordinate the fingers of a concert pianist or to create a three-dimensional landscape from light that falls on a two-dimensional retina’.
Gerald D. Fischbach, ‘Mind and Brain’, Scientific American 267(3):24, September 1992.

A few lines more into the article we read the deception coming into play , which is clearly purposed at persuading the mind of the reader that their is no mind required to design the mind that designed the wording and meaning for this article . All that is required is time , chance and blind random processes .....

Scientific American :
‘the current version [of the brain] is the result of millions of years of evolution. It is difficult to understand the brain because, unlike a computer, it was not built with specific purposes or principles of design in mind. Natural selection, the engine of evolution, is responsible.’
Gerald D. Fischbach, ‘Mind and Brain’, Scientific American 267(3):24, September 1992.

This is what todays generation is being swamped with . The deliberate ideological and philosophical propaganda of the proponents who wish to reject obvious evidence for design in order to satisfy their wilfull atheistic ideology and force it on others under the umbrella of using evolutionary theory to justify atheism .
Design with no designer is illogical .
DO NOT BE FOOLED ...........

--------------------------

http://bio-complexity.org/ojs/index.php/main/article/view/BIO-C.2013.2/BIO-C.2013.2

Isaac Asimov, for example, recognizes the apparent problem:

You can argue, of course, that the phenomenon of life may be an exception [to the second law]. Life on earth has steadily grown more complex, more versatile, more elaborate, more orderly, over the billions of years of the planet’s existence. From no life at all, living molecules were developed, then living cells, then living conglomerates of cells, worms, vertebrates, mammals, finally Man. And in Man is a three-pound brain which, as far as we know, is the most complex and orderly arrangement of matter in the universe. How could the human brain develop out of the primeval slime? How could that vast increase in order (and therefore that vast decrease in entropy) have taken place? [1]

Friday, 17 February 2012

DNA....ULTIMATE INFORMATION STORAGE SYSTEM :

DNA....ULTIMATE INFORMATION STORAGE SYSTEM :
In the age that we are living there is no excuse for not being familiar with that which we call INFORMATION . INFORMATION is all around us , we can not escape our INFORMATION age . We have come to understand what INFORMATION is and the importance of INFORMATION . Computer programs are becoming more complex and more complicated due to our ability to increase and develop , to a high degree , the INFORMATION storage capability of computer software and hardware .
So how do we define INFORMATION ?
INFORMATION is described as being ...Letters , words , numbers , symbols , Ordered sequences , codes , languages and meaning .
INFORMATION in it's purest form requires an INTELLIGENT Sender ( source ) of the INFORMATION ( code , language with meaning ) and Recipient ( receiver ) .
Put even more simply = An INTELLIGENT letter writer - letter with meaning and requiring action - An INTELLIGENT letter receiver . ie newspaper , book , computer programme etc .
All of the above definitions of INFORMATION require INTELLIGENCE .
SO , can we apply the same rules of INFORMATION to living organisms to determine the requirement of an INTELLIGENT source for the complex living organisms that inhabit our planet ?
DNA :
All living organisms have DNA ( deoxyribonucleic acid ) this DNA is 2 millionths of a millimeter thick and is of a double helix structure ( resulting in interlinking chemical letters and words ), it has four chemical letters A ( adenine ) , G ( guanine ) , T ( thymine ) and C ( cystocine ) . These four chemical letters make up the three letter words of the genetic code which result in producing the 20 amino acids that make up the 50,000 proteins of the human body . These chemical letters , are arranged in many definite sequences in order to produce the different 50,000 proteins . All of the proteins have to be encoded in such a way that protein synthesis can proceed optimally , combining the correct quantities of the required substances . There are approximately 3 billion genetic letters within human DNA .

Information content in a pinhead of human DNA .
Professor Werner Gitt :
The amount of information that could be stored in a pinhead’s volume of DNA is staggering. It is the equivalent information content of a pile of paperback books 500 times as tall as the distance from earth to the moon, each with a different, yet specific content
W. Gitt, Dazzling Design in Miniature, Creation 20(1):6, December 1997–February 1998.
-----
Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, commented that .....
"DNA is like a software program, only much more complex than anything we've ever devised."
-----
Michael Denton :
A teaspoon of DNA, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, could contain all the information needed to build the proteins for all the species of organisms that have ever lived on the earth, and "there would still be enough room left for all the information in every book ever written" (Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, 1996, p. 334).
-----
Dr. Stephen Meyer, director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, Wash., "was that DNA actually stores information—the detailed instructions for assembling proteins—in the form of a four-character digital code" (quoted by Lee Strobel, The Case for a Creator, 2004, p. 224).
-----
"The coding regions of DNA," explains Dr. Stephen Meyer, "have exactly the same relevant properties as a computer code or language" (quoted by Strobel, p. 237 )
-----
Each cell with genetic information, from bacteria to man, according to molecular biologist Michael Denton, consists of "artificial languages and their decoding systems, memory banks for information storage and retrieval, elegant control systems regulating the automated assembly of parts and components, error fail-safe and proof-reading devices utilized for quality control, assembly processes involving the principle of prefabrication and modular construction . . . [and a] capacity not equalled in any of our most advanced machines, for it would be capable of replicating its entire structure within a matter of a few hours" (Denton, p. 329).
-----
Dean Kenyon, a biology professor :
"This new realm of molecular genetics (is) where we see the most compelling evidence of design on the Earth" (ibid., p. 221).
-----
Dr Meyer :
"Evolutionists are still trying to apply Darwin's nineteenth-century thinking to a twenty-first century reality, and it's not working ... I think the information revolution taking place in biology is sounding the death knell for Darwinism and chemical evolutionary theories" (quoted by Strobel, p. 243).
-----
Pro W Gitt :
"The coding system used for living beings is optimal from an engineering standpoint. This fact strengthens the argument that it was a case of purposeful design rather that a [lucky] chance" (Gitt, p. 95).
-----
Professor Antony Flew : One time world leading atheistic evolutionary proponent ( not anymore )
"What I think the DNA material has done is show that intelligence must have been involved in getting these extraordinary diverse elements together," he said (quoted by Richard Ostling, "Leading Atheist Now Believes in God," Associated Press report, Dec. 9, 2004).
----
Therefore , the answer has to be a resounding .....YES..... for DNA requiring an INTELLIGENT source ........The evidence is overwhelming .
-----
Even the atheistic / evolutionary proponent Richard Dawkins agrees to the obvious INFORMATION content of DNA :

Richard Dawkins :
"There is enough information capacity in a single human cell to store the Encyclopaedia Britannica, all 30 volumes of it, three or four times over."
R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (New York: W.W. Norton, 1986), p. 115.

Signature in the cell after all?

"They go on to argue that their detailed analysis that the human genome (map here) displays a thorough precision-type orderliness in the mapping between DNA’s nucleotides and amino acids. “Simple arrangements of the code reveal an ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of symbolic language.” They say this includes the use of decimal notation, logical transformations, and the use of the abstract symbol of zero. “Accurate and systematic, these underlying patterns appear as a product of precision logic and nontrivial computing,” they assert. (...) This interpretation leads them to a farfetched conclusion: that the genetic code, “appears that it was invented outside the solar system already several billions years ago.”

But they don't give any credit to ID anyway:

"Can the claim of an alien signature in our genetic code be any more believable, or provable than biblical ID?
We know so little about the origin of life on Earth it seems presumptive to identify genetic structure that supposedly defies a natural explanation."

http://news.discovery.com/space/alien-life-exoplanets/could-an-alien-message-be-embedded-in-our-genetic-code-130401.htm

Thursday, 16 February 2012

So , how come there is a stegosaur like creature carved on a building which is 800 years old ?

800 year old STEGOSAURUS :
So , how come there is a stegosaur like creature carved on a building which is 800 years old ?
Well , in the jungles of Angkor Cambodia there are temples and palaces from the Khmer civilization , app 1200 ad. . One of the temples , Ta Prohm http://www.canbypublications.com/siemreap/temples/temp-taprohm.htm has many stone statues and reliefs. Most of the gray sandstone... is covered with ornate, detailed carvings. These show familiar animals like monkeys, deer , water buffalo , parrots and lizards. BUT INTERESTINGLY , one column displays an intricate carving of a stegosaur-like creature. The question must be asked " how could artists , 800 years ago , decorating this Buddhist temple know what a dinosaur looked like , when dino skeletons have , knowingly , only begun to be assembled during the past two hundred years ?"......And we are told dinosaurs died out over 60 million years ago . ( hypothetical years . And are part of the evolutionary interpretation of the evidences that we all have ) COULD IT BE THAT DINO'S AND MAN ACTUALLY LIVED ALONGSIDE ONE ANOTHER , and very recently ? Did these artists witness these animals for themselves ?
--------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Aft...er-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2

http://creation.com/did-angkor-really-see-a-dinosaur

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

THE TRUTH OF THE BATTLE :

THE TRUTH OF THE BATTLE :
Do not be in ignorance , but be in the true knowledge as to why it is extremely important to understand the implications that come with accepting the pseudoscience (1) of evolution for God's message to humanity and plan of salvation . Those who proselytize for the cause of the atheistic evolutionary paradigm clearly understand the implications..............................

‘Christianity has fought, still fights, and will continue to fight science to the desperate end over evolution, because evolution destroys utterly and finally the very reason Jesus’ earthly life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy Adam and Eve and the original sin, and in the rubble you will find the sorry remains of the Son of God. If Jesus was not the redeemer who died for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then Christianity is nothing.’
G. Richard Bozarth, ‘The Meaning of Evolution’, American Atheist, p. 30. 20 September 1979.
--------
1) Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice which is presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status.[1] Pseudoscience is often characterized by the use of vague, exaggerated or unprovable claims, an over-reliance on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation, a lack of openness to evaluation by other experts, and a general absence of systematic processes to rationally develop theories.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/compromising-followers-of-christ.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/say-no-to-two-in-bed.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/i-was-taught-to-share-but-there-are.html

Tuesday, 14 February 2012

THE FLY , a humble creature on Darwin's tree of life has an incredibly complex system for viewing its surroundings .

THE FLY , a humble creature on Darwin's tree of life has an incredibly complex system for viewing its surroundings . The fly's compound eye is well suited to its needs . Flies have eyes that bristle with individual lenses , each looking at a small field of vision and each connected in parallel to its part of the brain...... that processes the information . This parallel system gives flies a response time 4 times faster than our own , try catching one . As reported in The Times , 8th October 1993 , computer designers are trying to imitate this idea with parallel processors . Designers of solar panels could also benefit from studying the eye of the humble fly .

---------------------------------------------

"Solar panels could be improved by mimicking the design of the eyes of a fly that lived 45 million years ago . A pattern of ridges found on the surface of the fly's eyes could reduce reflection and so allow panels to capture light arriving at very oblique angles ."
New Scientist , 17th April 1999 . page 21 .
---------------------------------------------

THE LOBSTER : Another creature considered by evolutionsits to be low down on their tree of life . Its eye does not refract light . It channels the light through a Kind of converging optical fibre bundle . This principle is being exploited to make an X-Ray lens . X-Rays cannot be focussed like light . Yet another example of where intelligent human designers are copying designs in nature that only work when all components are present .
BLIND RANDOM CHANCE ????? I THINK NOT .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/butterfly.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/humble-brittlestar-has-lenses-that-are.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/eye-can-detect-single-photon-of-light.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/every-eye-will-see-him.html

Monday, 13 February 2012

EVIDENCE FOR YOUNGER SOLAR SYSTEM : Comets .

EVIDENCE FOR YOUNGER SOLAR SYSTEM :
Comets are just large dirty snowballs and they dissintegrate a little each time they come close to the sun . Periodic comets are evidence the solar system is young because comets could not have been orbiting past for millions of years or they would have completely dissipated long ago .
http://www.solarviews.com/eng/comet/whatis.htm
http://creation.com/comets-and-the-age-of-the-solar-system
http://creation.com/young-age-of-the-earth-universe-qa
http://creation.com/cometsportents-of-doom-or-indicators-of-youth

Sunday, 12 February 2012

FREE the SCIENCE FROM MOSES .

FREE the SCIENCE FROM MOSES .
Charles Lyell has a clear agenda, i.e. to “free the science from Moses”.
Bailey, E, British men of science: Charles Lyell, Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, London, Great Britain, 1962 p. 77-78.
----------

Lyell , wanted to do away with catastrophism within the geological record . Prior to Charles Lyell , the geological record was interpreted through catastrophism and understood as being the result of the Global worldwide Flood as recorded in the book of Genesis ch 6-9 and written down by Moses . He aimed to explain the history of the rocks through uniformitarianism and slow geological processes over eons of time . This gave Darwin the extra ammunition he needed which would be in support of his theory .
BUT , both have been proven to be short lived . The rocks clearly demonstrate catastrophism , what we observe is interpreted perfectly in the light of a Global Flood and a huge woldwide deluge of water . Also living complex organisms clearly demonstrate a non naturalistic explanation , requiring an intelligent source of origin.

Saturday, 11 February 2012

WHAT DO THE LEADERS SAY ?

There are some who do speak as representatives of Christianity , evolutionary paradigm and atheism . These representatives who are leaders to many followers ie Jesus Christ who created all things , Charles Darwin and Richard Dawkins .
Here is what they have to say .....

JESUS CHRIST :
John 8:12 When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, "I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never ...walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."http://bible.cc/john/8-12.htm

CHARLES DARWIN :
“…I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science .............."
http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-2109 .
Charles Darwin to Asa Gray, cited by Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin, (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1991) pp. 456, 475.

CHARLES DARWIN :
"It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts.”
Charles Darwin to Huxley . http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-2466 .

RICHARD DAWKINS :
Evolution has been observed. It's just that it hasn't been observed while it's happening.
http://www.politicalhotwire.com/science-technology/24201-richard-dawkins-evolution-has-been-observed.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YddmGJofbL0&feature=player_embedded#!

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/whos-rulesmans-or-gods.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/religious-philosphical-and-ideological.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/rag-of-hypothesis.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/free-science-from-moses.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/geology-assuredly-does-not-reveal-any.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-to-gradualism-over-eons-of-time.html

Friday, 10 February 2012

Confession of ignorance when it comes to origins :

More than 30 years of experimentation on the origin of life in the fields of chemical and molecular evolution have led to a better perception of the inmmensity of the problem of the origin of life on earth rather than to its solution . At present all discussions on principal theories and experiments in the field either end in stalemate or in a confession of ignorance .
Klaus Dose , " The origin of life , more questions than answers ." Interdisciplinary science review 13 , 348 .

Thursday, 9 February 2012

Carbon 14 .....EVIDENCE FOR A YOUNGER WORLD :

EVIDENCE FOR A YOUNGER WORLD ........Carbon 14 :
Excessive carbon 14 in deep geologic strata , which contradicts the evolutionary interpretation of the geology of our planet .

Carbon 14 (1) has a short half life (2) of 5700 years , with this in mind there should be no Carbon 14 atoms left within any Carbon that extends beyond the age of 250,000 years . BUT it is impossible to find any natural source of carbon below Pleistocene (3) (Ice Age) strata that does not contain within it demonstratable significant amounts of carbon 14, considering that such strata are supposed to be millions or billions of years (evolutionary timelines) old and the carbon 14 should have completely decayed and gone when applying the evolutionary timelines . But clearly it has not .
Modern day Carbon 14 laboratories are aware of this problem and anomaly and have been since the early 1980s, with this in mind they have striven to eliminate it , but are unable to account for it. Recently the world's best such laboratory which has learned over the past two decades of low-C14 measurements how not to contaminate specimens from external sources , contracted to creationists, confirmed observation results for coal samples and even for a dozen diamonds, which cannot be contaminated in situ with recent carbon.(4) These demonstrate and constitute extremely strong evidence that the earth is only thousands, not billions, of years old.

(1) Carbon 14 = Carbon-14 is a naturally occurring radioactive isotope of
carbon. = Radioactively decays from Carbon .= C14/C12 ratio gets smaller .
(2) Half life = Period of time it takes for the amount of a substance undergoing decay to decrease by half.
(3) Pleistocene age = Approximately ranging between 2.6 million to 11,000 years ago ( evolutationary timelines )
(4) Baumgardner, J. R., et al., Measurable 14C in fossilized organic materials: confirming the young earth creation-flood model, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Creationism, vol. II, Creation Science Fellowship (2003), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 127-142. Archived at http://www.icr.org/pdf/research/RATE_ICC_Baumgardner.pdf. See poster presented to American Geophysical Union, Dec. 2003, AGUC-14_Poster_Baumgardner.pdf.
http://www.ead.anl.gov/pub/doc/carbon14.pdf
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
http://creation.com/carbon-14-dating-explained-in-everyday-terms
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/evidence-for-younger-world-moon_16.html
http://creation.com/the-moons-recession-and-age
http://creation.com/the-moon-the-light-that-rules-the-night#f8
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/evidence-for-younger-world-tightly-bent.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/sea-is-not-salty-sodium-enough.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/evidence-for-younger-world-agriculture.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/evidence-for-younger-universe-supernova.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/evidence-for-younger-solar-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/evidence-for-younger-world-global-human.html
http://creation.com/6000-years

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

Chinese Lunar Year.......THE YEAR OF THE DRAGON :

THE YEAR OF THE DRAGON ........
The chinese Calendar , clearly , has twelve animals with each of the animals representing a lunar year . All the animals used to represent each lunar year have been chosen because they where observed and seen by human eyewitnesses .
So , why is it , the evolutionary proponents are in denial concerning one of the animals...... ? namely , the Dragon . It is obvious that these creatures are large terrible Lizards and are clearly the creatures that have been dug up since the 19th century , placed in museums and called Dinosaurs .

Chinese Paleontologist Dong Zhiming :
Chinese history ....
"The interpretation of dinosaurs as dragons goes back more than two thousand years in Chinese culture ."
Dong Zhiming ...
Secrets of the ica stones and nazca lines ,swift , page 80.
-----------------
Large Terrible Lizards co-existed with humanity . The name change in the 19th century to Dinosaurs did not change that fact . Evolutionary paleontology dreamed up the idea that dinosaurs went extinct 60-70 million years ago (Evolutionary years are hypothetical , there has not been this amount of earth orbits around the sun ) .
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/dinos-embedded-in-chinese-culture.html

If , the co-existence of dino and man is not a problem for the evolutionary paradigm , why , at all costs , is it denied when it is blatantly obvious dino and man co-existed in the recent past ?
Why is it that eyewitness accounts , cave drawings , pottery sketches , soft tissue etc are met with the most stupid of explanations to explain away this evidence ? Carl Sagan , for one , knew how serious a knock to the evolutionary paradigm the co existence of dino and man is . So , he came up with a totally non scientific answer which is ...........
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/if-my-memory-serves-me-well-dino.html
They must be in the human mind from long ago when they where actually witnessed and this resulted in them at a later date being expressed in drawings etc . What rubbish , for them to have witnessed dinosaurs they must have lived along side one another . Also it is claimed that the American Indians were able to replicate images of dinos because they at some time in the past were great paleontologists who dug up bones and put them together . Bearing in mind the native American Indians would not dig up bones due to their belief that bones were not to be tampered with for spiritual reasons etc . More to the point , it is obvious the American Indians witnessed dino's , just like the majority of other ancient and not so ancient civilizations .
To admit dino's lived with man would clearly be a hammer blow for the evolutionary timeline . The evolutionary paradigm is crumbling in all areas ......
-------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the ......Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/seems-to-me-to-be-another-dino-in-pages.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/dino-between-pages-of-bible.html
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/After-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2
------------
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/sauropods-apatosaurus-dinosaur-depicted.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/mosasaurus-dinosaur-depicted-on-ancient.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/native-american-indians-witness-dinos.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/if-my-memory-serves-me-well-dino.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/800-year-old-stegosaurus-so-how-come.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/tanystropheus-dinosaur-depicted-on.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/flying-winged-reptiles-serpentsaccount.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/evidence-for-watery-catastrophe.html

Tuesday, 7 February 2012

PHYSICAL reality of Jesus Christ .

1 JOHN 1:1-3 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life— 2the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us— 3that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ.
1 JOHN 3:5 But you know that he appeared so that he might take away our sins. And in him is no sin.
1 TIMOTHY 3:16 Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: He appeared in a body, was vindicated by the Spirit, was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/jesus-christ-came-to-fulfill-judaic-law.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/jesus-christ-walks-on-water.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/proclamation-of-gospel-good-news-of.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/jesus-christ-first-coming-achieves.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/signs-pointing-to-second-coming-of.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/no-excuses.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/lawleseness-and-moral-decline-signs.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/no-adam-no-sin-no-need-for-jesus-christ.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/jesus-christ-would-die-for-our-sins.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/jesus-christ-is-answer-to-genesis.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/jesus-christ-guilty-of-being-first.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/napolean-said-of-jesus-christ.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/jesus-christ-will-come-with-great-power.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/jesus-christ-walks-on-water.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/passover-lamb-of-god-jesus-christ.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/just-for-you-reliable-historical.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/will-you-recognize-truth.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/jesus-wept.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/signs-point-way.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/judgement-seat-of-christ-jesus.html

Monday, 6 February 2012

PRICE LIST for ABORTED BABY BODY PARTS :

SAY NO TO ABORTION :
PRICE LIST FOR ABORTED BABY PARTS ....................
STOP THE CULL NOW .............

Saturday, 4 February 2012

A HOLOCAUST IN OUR TIME :

A HOLOCAUST IN OUR TIME : Are you being deceived and are we collectively being deceived into rejecting the truth of when a human life begins or who is and who is not human ? Adolf Hitler managed to convince an entire nation into believing the Jewish people , and other people groups , were not human and deserved to be executed . Millions of people were legally murdered across Europe by Adolf Hitlers nazi regime . Millions of unborn children are being legally murdered across the world because they are deemed as not being human by the government and people of the country that executes them . They are murdered in the very place that they should be protected and nurtered , THE WOMB . Watch this video now for the truth and reject the deception . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y2KsU_dhwI&feature=player_embedded

The child in the womb is a human baby :
Luke 1:41 When Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit.
The bible says the following about commiting murder :
The sixth commandment .........Exodus 20 : 13“You shall not murder."
http://www.pathlights.com/abortion/abort03.htm

Friday, 3 February 2012

SPECIAL ORIGINS :

"WHY DOES IT MATTER WHERE WE COME FROM ?"
ACCORDING to Gods special revelation to mankind , The Bible , Gods Word , we have been created in His image .
GENESIS 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. http://esv.scripturetext.com/genesis/1.htm
We have been created for a purpose , which is to be in relationship with Him who created all things . This gives us dignity and meaning in life and with this comes the reality that He who Created us makes the rules . This means we are accountable to Him , He is our judge and our lawgiver ...................
ISAIAH 32:22 For the Lord is our judge; the Lord is our lawgiver;
the Lord is our king; he will save us.http://esv.scripturetext.com/isaiah/33-22.htm

In CONTRAST :

ACCORDING to the ideological philosophical and atheistic evolutionary worldview we have arrived on the scene through animal ancestry . Resulting in a long line of apelike intermediate ancestors , with no meaning , purpose , dignity or accountability to anything or anyone . With no answer to the origin of morals ie what is right or wrong ? With no ultimate lawmaker who sets the rules . And a consistent evolutionary view holds that there is no purpose for the existence of any of us , and that means YOU . This worldview leads people to making their own rules , therefore the rules are dependent upon who makes them and there is no requirement to listen to or adhere to the inherent God given moral conscience that all of us possess . This has been demonstrated to have catastrophic consequences over the past two centuries , when atheism and evolutionary worldviews have been used to give credence to mass murder on a grand scale .

Leading evolutionist Jeremy Rifkin , said the following ................
‘We no longer feel ourselves to be guests in someone else’s home and therefore obliged to make our behavior conform with a set of pre-existing cosmic rules. It is our creation now. We make the rules. We establish the parameters of reality. We create the world, and because we do, we no longer feel beholden to outside forces. We no longer have to justify our behavior, for we are now the architects of the universe. We are responsible to nothing outside ourselves, for we are the kingdom, the power, and the glory for ever and ever.’
Jeremy Rifkin, Algeny, p. 244 (Viking Press, New York), 1983.

Compare what Mr Rifkin said to what Jesus Christ said ............

MATHEW 7:12 “So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.http://esv.scripturetext.com/matthew/7.htm

SO , the answer to the question , " Why does it matter where we come from ?"

Answer = "Because , a persons view of their origins ultimately shapes their moral outlook , how they treat other people and how they view themselves ."

CLEARLY , being consistent with both worldviews , it only follows that the biblical account is the worldview which places human beings in their rightful place .......A SPECIAL CREATION MADE IN THE IMAGE OF GOD .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/fully-human-from-beginning.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/fossils-reject-darwins-tree-of-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/fossils-say-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/origins-of-vertebrates.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/dreams-and-visions-for-evolutionary.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/green-machine.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/best-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/winged-insects-suddenly-appear.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/it-means-what-it-says.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/spiders-millipedes-etc-suddenly-appear.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/planted-by-designer.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/it-never-seemed-to-happen.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/millions-of-dead-things-buried-in-mud.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/origin-of-reptiles.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/made-ape-of-homo-habilis.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/cambrian-big-bang.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/biological-boom-of-cambrian.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/cambrian-explosion-clearly-demonstrates.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/darwin-was-right-fatal-to-theory-is-in.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/fossil-record-clearly-supports-creation.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-fast-can-evolution-get.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/and-what-i-like-to-ask-my-biologist.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/marine-reptiles-can-not-be-credibly.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/special-origins.html

Thursday, 2 February 2012

The BEST INTERPRETATION of the EVIDENCE ????

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

DECEPTIVE interpretation of the EVIDENCE for HUMAN ORIGINS :

SO , what does the EVIDENCE show concerning the ORIGINS of MAN ?
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
You , like me , have been told that we have common ancestry with the great apes , at some time in the far distant past . We have been told , the evidence supporting this claim is abundant and open for all to behold . After all , we only have to wander down to our local museum or open up a textbook and there in wonderful colorful presentation before our very eyes lay the evidence for all to see and behold . BUT , are we being led to believe something as true , which is not ? IS there something WE are NOT being TOLD ?
The answer to both of those questions is a RESOUNDING........YES .
We find in the writings and sayings of leading evolutionists and other prominent scientist's what the evidence really shows and demonstrates .

Dr. Lyall Watson, Anthropologist :
"Modern apes, for instance, seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans - of upright, naked, tool-making, big-brained beings - is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter." - Dr. Lyall Watson, Anthropologist. 'The water people'. Science Digest, vol. 90, May 1982, p. 44.

Do you hear what Dr Lyall is saying here ?..........Modern apes sprung out of nowhere , with no fossil record . He says there is no evidence to support the commonly held evolutionary belief in the origins of modern humans . He says concerning modern apes and modern humans that their origins are a ....." mysterious matter ."
-------------
The fossil record pertaining to man is still so sparsely known that those who insist on positive declarations can do nothing more than jump from one hazardous surmise to another and hope that the next dramatic discovery does not make them utter fools ... Clearly some refuse to learn from this. As we have seen, there are numerous scientists and popularizers today who have the temerity to tell us that there is 'no doubt' how man originated: if only they had the evidence..."
(William R Fix, The Bone Pedlars, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1984, p.150)

Another , we are being told there is no evidence to support this evolutionary interpretation of the evidence , because the evidence is simply not there .
-------------
RICHARD C. LEWONTIN, Prof. of Zoology, Harvard, "Look, I'm a person who says in this book [Human Diversity, 1982 that we don't know anything about the ancestors of the human species. All the fossils which have been dug up and are claimed to be ancestors we haven't the faintest idea whether they are ancestors. ....All you've got is Homo sapiens there, you've got that fossil there, you've got another fossil there...and it's up to you to draw the lines. Because there are no lines.", Harpers, 2/84

We are being told here that there are no lines connecting modern humans ( Homo Sapiens ) with anything in the fossil record , And anything that has been claimed to be our ancestors have nothing in support of this claim .
------------
We cannot identify ancestors or "missing links," and we cannot devise testable theories to explain how particular episodes of evolution came about. Gee is adamant that all the popular stories about how the first amphibians conquered the dry land, how the birds developed wings and feathers for flying, how the dinosaurs went extinct, and how humans evolved from apes are just products of our imagination, driven by prejudices and preconceptions
Bowler, Peter J., Review of In Search of Deep Time by Henry Gee (Free Press, 1999), American Scientist (vol. 88, March/April 2000), p. 169.

NOW just look at that .......NO identifiable ancestors or missing links , NO testable theories , only popular stories that are products of vivid imaginations , concerning every branch of biological evolution . And to top it off the motivation for DECEIVING billions of men , women and children is driven by PREJUDICES and PRECONCEPTIONS .

WOW........... I reckon that this must be a shock to YOU who LIKE ME have been brought up to believe that evolution had all the answers when in reality they have no TRUTHFUL answers only pure imaginitive STORYTELLING . Now I do not know about you , but to me that is DECEPTION on a grand scale . Billions have lived and died being told that they have a common ancestor , which came from the great apes a long time ago when in reality the evidence CLEARLY points to HUMANS having always been HUMANS from the BEGINNING.
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/fully-human-from-beginning.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/fossils-reject-darwins-tree-of-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/fossils-say-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/origins-of-vertebrates.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/dreams-and-visions-for-evolutionary.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/green-machine.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/best-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/winged-insects-suddenly-appear.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/it-means-what-it-says.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/spiders-millipedes-etc-suddenly-appear.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/planted-by-designer.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/it-never-seemed-to-happen.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/origin-of-reptiles.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/made-ape-of-homo-habilis.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/cambrian-big-bang.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/biological-boom-of-cambrian.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/cambrian-explosion-clearly-demonstrates.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/darwin-was-right-fatal-to-theory-is-in.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/fossil-record-clearly-supports-creation.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-fast-can-evolution-get.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/and-what-i-like-to-ask-my-biologist.html