Be The Voice - Gen1Rev22: April 2012

Sunday 29 April 2012

YOUNGER WORLD , EVIDENCE FOR : WHERE ARE ALL THE STONE AGE SKELETONS ?

YOUNGER WORLD , EVIDENCE FOR :
WHERE ARE ALL THE STONE AGE SKELETONS ?
Homo Sapiens ( wise and rational man / Human beings ) , according to evolutionary anthropologists , inhabited our planet for some 185,000 years before the advent of agriculture . 1 The human population for this time period of some 185,000 years was at an average constant , between one and ten million . Obviously the dead had to be buried , some may have been cremated or buried at sea or even vapourised by some long lost weapon of mass destruction , and this included being buried with artifacts etc . The above scenario would have resulted in approximately eight billion bodies having been buried .2 BUT where are the bodies ? If eight billion stone age buriels took place then we should expect the ground to be full of stone age skeletons and their artifacts ( evolutionary timelines would allow bones to last much longer than 200,000 years in the ground , especially the buried artifacts ) . But only a few thousand have been found . This surely implies a much shorter stone age than has been applied by evolutionary theory . The evidence is pointing to a stone age of only a few hundred years .
1 . McDougall, I., F. H. Brown, and J. G. Fleagle, Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia, Nature 433(7027):733-736 (17 February 2005).
2 . Deevey, E. S., The human population, Scientific American 203:194-204
......srh
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/evidence-for-younger-world-moon_16.html
http://creation.com/the-moons-recession-and-age
http://creation.com/the-moon-the-light-that-rules-the-night#f8
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/evidence-for-younger-world-tightly-bent.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/sea-is-not-salty-sodium-enough.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/evidence-for-younger-world-agriculture.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/evidence-for-younger-universe-supernova.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/evidence-for-younger-solar-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/evidence-for-younger-world-global-human.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/carbon-14-evidence-for-younger-world.html
http://creation.com/6000-years

Saturday 28 April 2012

The teaching concerning the days of creation as being literal days are confirmed here....

Clearly , the teaching concerning the days of creation as being literal days are confirmed here , where the literal days of creation are compared with the literal days of the week . Although a sabbath day of millions of years would be great a working week of days which where millions of years in length , would not be so great .
EXODUS 20:8-11 “Remember to observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. 9You have six days each week for your ordinary work, 10but the seventh day is a Sabbath day of rest dedicated to the Lord your God. On that day no one in your household may do any work. This includes you, your sons and daughters, your male and female servants, your livestock, and any foreigners living among you. 11For in six days the Lord made the heavens, the earth, the sea, and everything in them; but on the seventh day he rested. That is why the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and set it apart as holy.http://nlt.scripturetext.com/exodus/20.htm

Luther said :

“When Moses writes that God created heaven and earth and whatever is in them in six days, then let this period continue to have been six days, and do not venture to devise any comment according to which six days were one day. But if you cannot understand how this could have been done in six days, then grant the Holy Spirit the honor of being more learned than you are. For you are to deal with Scripture in such a way that you bear in mind that God Himself says what is written. But since God is speaking, it is not fitting for you wantonly to turn His Word in the direction you wish to go.”

—What Luther Says. A Practical In-Home Anthology for the Active Christian, compiled by Ewald M. Plass, Concordia, 1959, p. 93.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/just-how-long-where-days-of-creation.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/it-means-what-it-says-and-fossil.html

http://creation.com/6000-years

http://creation.com/is-the-seventh-day-an-eternal-day

Friday 27 April 2012

Disapearing organs ......only in the mind of the evolutionist :

There remains, however, this difficulty. After an organ has ceased being used, and has become in consequence much reduced, how can it be still further reduced in size until the merest vestige is left; and how can it be finally quite obliterated? It is scarcely possible that disuse can go on producing any further effect after the organ... has once been rendered functionless. Some additional explanation is here requisite which I cannot give.
Charles Darwin, Origin of Species .
--------------
Lots of evolutionary imagination is the answer ..........................And has been in use since Darwin made this quote .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/appendix-still-clearly-in-use.html

Thursday 26 April 2012

Just who is using the airways ..................?????

"TELEVISION is the major mainstream INFILTRATION for the new SATANIC religion ."
Anton Lavey founder of The Church of Satan ;
The Devils notebook p86 .

ISAIAH 14:12-15
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
15Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.

Wednesday 25 April 2012

YOU FUNDAMENTALIST YOU......................

We are living during times in which the word ...FUNDAMENTALIST.....is being used in a mass hysteria negative way . This is resulting in certain groups being labelled incorrectly with this negative add on to the word FUNDAMENTALIST . How many times have you heard people say " You are a Christian FUNDAMENTALIST ." or " Those Christian FUNDAMENTALISTS." And many other similar sounding statements ?
Richard Dawkins , atheistic evolutionary speaker and writer , says the following concerning true followers ( FUNDAMENTALISTS ) of Jesus Christ :
“There are no Christians, as far as I know, blowing up buildings. I am not aware of any Christian suicide bombers. I am not aware of any major Christian denomination that believes the penalty for apostasy is death. I have mixed feelings about the decline of Christianity, in so far as Christianity might be a bulwark against something worse.”
Ruth Gledhill, Scandal and schism leave Christians praying for a ‘new Reformation’, The Times (UK), 2 April 2010.

Jesus Christ said the following concerning the non (physical) violent proclamation of His message and the way in which His followers should conduct themselves in the proclamation of His Word .

Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.” JOHN 18:36 .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/jesus-answered-my-kingdom-is-not-of.html

Tuesday 24 April 2012

IT MEANS WHAT IT SAYS AND FOSSIL EVIDENCE BACKS IT UP....

So , what is meant by the Creation account in Genesis chapter 1 ?
From a grammatical reading of the text , it is clearly understood as creation in six earth rotation , 24 hour days .
Mr Pattle Pun , who is a biology and chemistry lecturer at Wheaton College , illinois , accepts exactly that . But has rejected it's true meaning and instead has applied evolutionary science to the text and eons of time .

Mr Pattle Pun :
‘It is apparent that the most straightforward understanding of Genesis, without regard to the hermeneutical considerations suggested by science, is that God created the heavens and the earth in six solar days, that man was created on the sixth day, and that death and chaos entered the world after the fall of Adam and Eve, and that all fossils [sic — creationists would say ‘most’] were the result of the catastrophic deluge that spared only Noah’s family and the animals therewith.’
Pun, P.P.T., Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 39:14, 1987;

--------------

Charles Hodge (1797–1878) systematic theologian , Princeton seminary, also accepted a literal reading of the Creation account in the book of Genesis means to convey six days and each day being a 24 hour period (one Earth rotation) .
‘It is of course admitted that, taking this account [Genesis] by itself, it would be most natural to understand the word [day] in its ordinary sense; but if that sense brings the Mosaic account into conflict with facts, [millions of years] and another sense avoids such conflict, then it is obligatory on us to adopt that other.’

Charles Hodge (1797–1878) systematic theologian , Princeton seminary, wrote many books and articles defending the truths of Christianity, including Biblical inerrancy. But lapsed by rejecting the plain meaning of Genesis because of alleged geological facts, which were really uniformitarian interpretations of facts.

Hodge, C., Systematic Theology, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, MI, USA, pp. 570–571, 1997;
-----------

Luther said :
“When Moses writes that God created heaven and earth and whatever is in them in six days, then let this period continue to have been six days, and do not venture to devise any comment according to which six days were one day. But if you cannot understand how this could have been done in six days, then grant the Holy Spirit the honor of being more learned than you are. For you are to deal with Scripture in such a way that you bear in mind that God Himself says what is written. But since God is speaking, it is not fitting for you wantonly to turn His Word in the direction you wish to go.”
—What Luther Says. A Practical In-Home Anthology for the Active Christian, compiled by Ewald M. Plass, Concordia, 1959, p. 93. GENESIS 1 http://kingjbible.com/genesis/1.htm
GENESIS 6 http://kingjbible.com/genesis/6-1.htm

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/teaching-concerning-days-of-creation-as.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/just-how-long-where-days-of-creation.htm
http://creation.com/6000-years
http://creation.com/is-the-seventh-day-an-eternal-day

Sunday 22 April 2012

Justification for mass murder ................

“Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, with its brutally materialist account of nature as bleak survivalism, was made to serve as justification for the extermination of Namibian tribes and, later, for Hitler’s biological anti-Semitism.”
Ian Thompson, review of The Kaiser’s Holocaust: Germany’s Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of ... Nazism, by David Olusoga and Casper Erichsen, Faber and Faber, 2010, in Telegraph (UK). p. 54, Picador, London, 2009.
---------
The ideas of Charles Darwin have greatly influenced the people of this planet for the past one hundred and fifty years or so , since Darwin's work was published . Sadly the majority of people who have been directly affected by this work will probably not have read it or even understood any of it . In the main it has been those who have been in position of authority who have worked out Darwin's thoughts on the people they have had authority over . Hitler , Stalin , Pol Pot etc are but a few of those who have been responsible for this .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/darwin-to-hitler-connection.html

Saturday 21 April 2012

The Darwin to Hitler connection .....

The Darwin to Hitler connection .....
‘Since Darwin’s death, all has not been rosy in the evolutionary garden. The theories of the Great Bearded One have been hijacked by cranks, politicians, social reformers—and scientists—to support racist and bigoted views. A direct line runs from Darwin, through the founder of the eugenics movement—Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton—to the extermination camps of Nazi Europe.’
Martin Brookes, ‘Ripe old age,’ New Scientist 161(2171):41, 1999.
----------------------------
The ideas of Charles Darwin have greatly influenced the people of this planet for the past one hundred and fifty years or so , since Darwin's work was published . Sadly the majority of people who have been directly affected by this work will probably not have read it or even understood any of it . In the main it has been those who have been in position of authority who have worked out Darwin's thoughts on the people they have had authority over . Hitler , Stalin , Pol Pot etc are but a few of those who have been responsible for this .
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/justification-for-mass-murder.html
http://creation.com/review-walker-swastika-against-the-cross
http://creation.com/darwinian-roots-of-nazi-legal-system

Thursday 19 April 2012

IMAGINITIVE UNIFORMITARIANISM ..........

'UNIFORMITARIANISM' " The present is the key to the past ." The rate at which we observe geological physical processes happening in the present , was claimed by Charles Lyell to be the method by which we should interpret and apply the past history of our planet . BUT , according to Stephen J Gould ( Paleontologist ) , Lyell ignored what the evidence demonstrates and relied upon his imagination .
Gould, Stephen Jay :
‘Charles Lyell was a lawyer by profession, and his book is one of the most brilliant briefs published by an advocate Lyell relied upon two bits of cunning to establish his uniformitarian views as the only true geology. First, he set up a straw man to demolish. … In fact, the catastrophists were much more empirically minded than Lyell. The geologic record does seem to require catastrophes: rocks are fractured and contorted; whole faunas are wiped out. To circumvent this literal appearance, Lyell imposed his imagination upon the evidence. The geologic record, he argued, is extremely imperfect and we must interpolate into it what we can reasonably infer but cannot see. The catastrophists were the hardnosed empiricists of their day, not the blinded theological apologists.’
Gould, Stephen Jay, Professor of Paleontology and Geology at Harvard, in ‘Natural History’ Feb 1975 p.16.

Wednesday 18 April 2012

THE INCREDIBLE GROWING RIB :

THE INCREDIBLE GROWING RIB :
1 TIMOTHY 2:13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
GENESIS 2:2 And the RIB that the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man.
---------
Interestingly , the rib is the only bone that will grow back , if it is removed correctly , once it has been removed .
...So , we read here in the first chapters of the book of Genesis , written down approximately four thousand years ago , what most of us in the claimed modern technologically advanced age ......including people of medicine .....are amazed to hear and learn .
Evolutionary theory has no adequate answer to the question as to the origin of the sexes , it is chicken and egg . But , He who created all things tells us where the first man came from , HE CREATED HIM , where the first woman came from , HE CREATED HER FROM THE RIB OF MAN .
This is becoming not so difficult to understand in our modern scientific era , with the ability to manipulate the cells of living organisms . But we must remember in order to manipulate the cells of living organisms an input of INTELLLIGENCE is needed . How much more INTELLIGENT is He who created all the living cells for all the living organisms we find on our wonderful vibrant life filled planet .

Tuesday 17 April 2012

BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH in the light without evolution

BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH in the light without evolution :
Evolution is beyond what is required or sufficient (not sufficient , superfluous ) for real biological research . We hear so many times from those claiming and thinking ( falsely ) that biology and the study of biology can only be understood in the light of evolutionary theory . But this is not true and is a deliberate deception of the facts .
---...----------
Witham, Larry A. anti-creationist :
“Surprisingly, however, the most notable aspect of natural scientists in assembly is how little they focus on evolution. Its day-to-day irrelevance is a great ‘paradox’ in biology, according to a BioEssays special issue on evolution in 2000. ‘While the great majority of biologists would probably agree with Theodosius Dobzhansky’s dictum that “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution”, most can conduct their work quite happily without particular reference to evolutionary ideas”, the editor wrote. “Evolution would appear to be the indispensable unifying idea and, at the same time, a highly superflous one.” The annual programs of science conventions also tell the story. When the zoologists met in 1995 (and changed their name to the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology), just a few dozen of the 400 academic papers read were on evolution. The North American Paleontological Convention of 1996 featured 430 papers, but only a few included the word ‘evolution’ in their titles. The 1998 AAS meeting organised 150 scientific sessions, but just 5 focused on evolution—as it relates to biotechnology, the classification of species, language, race and primate families.”
Witham, Larry A., Where Darwin Meets the Bible: Creationists and Evolutionists in America (hardcover), p. 43, Oxford University Press, 2002.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/only-biology-that-has-proceeded-in.html

Sunday 15 April 2012

FROM THE CLAY.......................

COME ON , do YOU expect me to believe that ?
The Bible tells us in GENESIS chapter 2 verse 7 ( written record , as we have it today , written down by Moses approximately 3500 years ago ) that God formed ( made ) man from the dust of the ground ..............

GENESIS 2:7 "And the Lord God formed man of the DUST OF THE GROUND, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became... a living soul."

...INTERESTINGLY , according to Scientists at NASA's Ames research centre , the ingredients to form a human being can be FOUND in CLAY .
--------------
The article says "The Biblical scenario for the creation of life turns out to be NOT FAR OFF THE MARK."
Readers Digest , How Life on Earth Began , ."(Reader's Digest, November, 1982 p.116) .
-------------
I say , RIGHT on the MARK .

Saturday 14 April 2012

THE TRUTH OF THE BATTLE .

THE TRUTH OF THE BATTLE :
Do not be in ignorance , but be in the true knowledge as to why it is extremely important to understand the implications that come with accepting the pseudoscience of evolution for God's message to humanity and plan of salvation . Those who proselytize for the cause of the atheistic evolutionary paradigm clearly understand the implications .
--------
‘Christianity... has fought, still fights, and will continue to fight science to the desperate end over evolution, because evolution destroys utterly and finally the very reason Jesus’ earthly life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy Adam and Eve and the original sin, and in the rubble you will find the sorry remains of the Son of God. If Jesus was not the redeemer who died for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then Christianity is nothing.’
G. Richard Bozarth, ‘The Meaning of Evolution’, American Atheist, p. 30. 20 September 1979.

Friday 13 April 2012

AGENDA ...THE NATURALISTIC MATERIALISTIC road is to be followed , no matter what :

Wednesday 11 April 2012

Ladder of human evolution is broken .............

Ladder of human evolution is broken .......
MISSING LINKS ! there are no missing links . How can something be missing if it has never been in existence ? Millions of people have been deceived into accepting a smooth easy to follow and marked out progression from a common ancestor to present day humanity . We have all seen the easy to follow pictures in textbooks that show a common ancestral ape going through the change to humans .

Bernard Wood , evolutionist anthropologist :
"When I went to medical school in 1963, human evolution looked like a ladder." he [Bernard Wood] says. The ladder stepped from monkey to man through a progression of intermediates, each slightly less ape-like than the last. Now human evolution looks like a bush. We have a menagerie of fossil hominids... HOW THEY ARE RELATED TO EACH OTHER AND WHICH , IF ANY OF THEM , ARE HUMAN FOREBEARS IS STILL DEBATED .
John Whitfield, "Oldest member of human family found," Nature, 11 July 2002

Henry Gee - senior editor of Nature and a leading paleoanthropologist :
Whatever the outcome, the skull shows, once and for all, that the old idea of a 'missing link' is bunk... It should now be quite plain that the very idea of the missing link, always shaky, is now completely untenable .
The Guardian, 11 July 2002 .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/false-evolutionary-jumping-claim-apes.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/deception-and-illusion-is-still-being.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/recent-common-ancestors-for-all.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/large-differences-in-dna-not-small-ones.html

Tuesday 10 April 2012

ORIGIN of Life .......Boiled broth .

ORIGIN of Life .......Boiled broth .
The commencement of life , on this planet , using the evolutionary paradigm could not have happened without the BIG BANG . But , yet again , let us pretend the BIG BANG did happen and look at how life commenced on this planet :Louis Pasteur who finally laid to rest the idea that simple living things can grow from nothing . He boiled up some broth that contained proteins , fats and other components of organic tissue . When left to cool in the air it was not long before mould started to grow on the surface . But , he found that by excluding the air no mould developed . Pasteur discovered that it is the air-borne bacteria that cause the mould . Life could not have arisen spontaneously from a primeval soup . It is not possible to generate living things from non-living matter . UNLESS YOU WANT TO BELIEVE A FAIRY TALE .
-----------
Almost a century and a half after Darwin , the origin of life remains one of the great unsolved problems of science .It is one thing for a primitive cell to be painstakingly designed and manufactured by a team of trained organic chemists in a laboratory full of expensive equipment , quite another for it to happen spntaneously in the rough and tumble of the natural world . The range and diversity of the theories serve to confirm that , to date , we really do not have much of a clue about how or where life began , or how long it took .

Paul Davies New Scientist 11th Feb 2006 p48 .

Sunday 8 April 2012

JESUS CHRIST GUILTY of being the first fruits of the Resurrection:

Friday 6 April 2012

The Crucifixion | A Medical Perspective .

Mathew 12:40 For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.http://esv.scripturetext.com/matthew/12.htm
Jesus Christ used Jonah http://esv.scripturetext.com/jonah/1.htm , when speaking to his disciples concerning his soon coming death and resurrection .

He was telling his disciple what must soon take place so that once it had happened they would remember what He had told them and this would be confirmation to them .Although they did not understand what He was telling them at the time , concerning the meaning behind His Words in relation too the events that would soon happen .
And sure enough what Jesus Christ told His disciples would happen did happen . He was arrested , put on trial and found quilty .
Although Pilate Himself said He found no guilt of any crime to accuse Him of Luke 23:22 http://bible.cc/luke/23-22.htm A third time he said to them, “Why, what evil has he done? I have found in him no guilt deserving death. I will therefore punish and release him.”...... , He was sentenced to death by crucifixion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-EVfxABSoU . He was led away and nailed to a piece of wood and a spear pierced His side . He was confirmed dead at the scene of His execution , He was placed in a tomb , for three days he was dead , on the third day he rose . 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 4that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, 5and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 6Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. 7Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. 8Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me . ..

Wednesday 4 April 2012

LARGE DIFFERENCES IN DNA not small ones , seperate apes and monkeys from both humans and each other .

FALSE EVOLUTIONARY JUMPING CLAIM :
Chimp and Human DNA .
I well let the experts do all the explaining for this one as it is so obvious .
"We are told that we share 98.5 per cent of our DNA with chimps , a figure touted so widely it has almost become a mantra . Now it seems that number is WRONG . We actually share less than 95 per cent of our genetic material , so the difference is three times as great as was thought ."
New Scientist , 28th September 2002 page 20 .

Contrary to what you might think , LARGE DIFFERENCES IN DNA not small ones , seperate apes and monkeys from both humans and each other . Scientists believed that differences between primates were mainly the result of variations in individual DNA letters . But a detailed comparison of human chromosome 21 with corresponding pagregions of genetic material in chimpanzees , orang utans , rhesus macaques and woolly monkeys show the differences affect GREAT CHUNKS OF DNA .
New Scientist , 15th March 2003 page 26 . Genome Research vol 13 page 341 .

Dr Patrick Gill , FRCR writes :
" As there are at least 3,000 million units in the DNA chain , the real mismatch between humans and chimpanzeesd works out at 30 million per cell , which any scientist or doctor knows to be an unbridgeable chasm "
Medical Journal of Australia , vol 152 April 1990 .

Dr Barney Maddox , Leading genetic genome researcher , said , concerning these genetic differences , "Now the genetic difference between human and his nearest relative , the chimpanzee , is at least 1.6% . That does not sound like much , but calculated out that is a gap of at least 48,000,000 nucleotides , and a change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal to an animal . There is no possibility of change ."
Human Genome Project , Quantative A Disproof of Evolution , CEM facts sheet . Cited in doubts about evolution ?

As you will notice , present day revelations and observations are confirming past and present observations . Dr Patrick Gill wrote his observations in 1990 so , considering the modern day revelations , as described in the other two quotes found in New Scientist , modern science is certainly contradicting the theory of Biological evolution or is it that biological evolution is evolving towards supporting the biblical creation interpretation of the evidence ?

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/false-evolutionary-jumping-claim-apes.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/deception-and-illusion-is-still-being.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/recent-common-ancestors-for-all.html

Tuesday 3 April 2012

RECENT COMMON ANCESTORS for all :

RECENT COMMON ANCESTORS for all :
PARSONS ET AL : A team of geneticists found that the rate of mutation of mtDNA is twenty times higher than expected . This dates Y Chromosome Adam and Mitochondria Eve between 5,000 to 10,000 years ago .
Nature Genetica , vol 15 No 4 1997 page 363-7 .
http://www.stat.yale.edu/~jtc5/papers/CommonAncestors/NatureCommonAncestors-Article.pdf

...An individual that is the genealogical ancestor of all living humans existed just a few thousand years ago . Had you entered any village on earth in around 3000bc , the first person you would have met would probably have been your ancestor .
Nature vol 431 , page 562 2004 .
---------
Modern science IS confirming what is written in the history book of the world , the No 1 bestseller THE WORD OF GOD , the 66 books that make up the Old and New Testaments , The Bible .
GENESIS 3:20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

http://esv.scripturetext.com/genesis/3.htm

http://creation.com/creation-videos?fileID=B5VY5ZBaQVU

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/false-evolutionary-jumping-claim-apes.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/deception-and-illusion-is-still-being.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/recent-common-ancestors-for-all.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/large-differences-in-dna-not-small-ones.html

Sunday 1 April 2012

FALSE EVOLUTIONARY JUMPING CLAIM : Apes to Humans....

FALSE EVOLUTIONARY JUMPING CLAIM :
Apes to Humans .
Mans bipedalism (ability to walk upright ) requires a more precise balancing mechanism than creatures that go on all fours . Fossil men and apes can be distinguished by examining the labyrinth , a hard bony structure of the inner ear that is preserved during fossilisation . Professor Bernard Wood of University of Liverpool did computerised tomography scans of inner ears of fossil apes and man . Man , who is bipedal , has a more complex pattern of the labyrinth than Knuckle walking apes . Man requires a more sophisticated balancing mechanism . There are no intermediate patterns .

Among the fossil hominids , the earliest to demonstrate the modern human morphology is Homo Erectus . In contrast the semi circular dimensions in crania from Southern Africa attributed to Australopithecus and Paranthropus resemble those of ...the extinct great apes .
Nature 23rd June 1994 , page 645 .

"There are not enough fossil records to answer WHEN , WHERE and HOW homo sapiens emerged."
Takahata , Molecular anthropology , Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1995 p355 .

Spanish and American researches used CT scans to measure the bones and spaces in the outer and middle ears of five specimens , thought to be Homo heidelbergensis. They then worked out how well the hearing apparatus they found could respond to various frequencies . Like modern humans the hominids ears would have been sensitive to frequencies in the range from 2 to 4 kilohertz , suggesting that they too could distinguish the sounds of speech . Chimpanzees ears are relatively insensitive at those frequencies .
New Scientist 26 June 2004 .

Not only are chimps not in the same league as men and women when it comes to converstation , but their sense of musical harmony leaves much to be desired :

Monkeys do not prefer sounds that are harmonious to human ears . Suggesting that people have a unique appreciation of music . Even young infants enjoy hearing consonant intervals more , suggesting that PEOPLE ARE HARD WIRED WITH THE PREFERENCE AT BIRTH .
New Scientist 25 September 2004 page 17 .

"Fossil evidence of human evolutionary history is fragmentary and open to various interpretations . Fossil evidence of chimpanzee evolution is ABSENT ALTOGETHER."
Return to the planet of the apes , Henry Gee , Nature Vol 412 , 12 July 2001 , p 131 .