Be The Voice - Gen1Rev22: May 2012

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Speculations about how organisms may have arisen is not required by doctors ......

Dr Skell wrote, “It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers ….”
Skell, P.S., The Dangers Of Overselling Evolution; Focusing on Darwin and his theory doesn't further scientific progress, Forbes magazine, 23 Feb 2009;
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/23/evolution-creation-debate-biology-opinions-contributors_darwin.html.
-----------
How many times have we heard that we need to understand biology in the light of evolutionary paradigm ? How many times have we heard that understanding the biology of complex living organisms through an evolutionary mindset has led to many medical breakthrough's ? And claims of a similar standing in an attempt to claim that The evolutionary paradigm is making sense of our world .Well it seems to me that those who are in the know are not in agreement with those who make these claims .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/biological-research-in-light-without.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/evolution-not-taken-into-account.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/only-biology-that-has-proceeded-in.html

Sunday, 27 May 2012

No insect in betweeners ...........

Friday, 25 May 2012

WHY such a BIG UNIVERSE containing so much MASS ?

WHY such a BIG UNIVERSE containing so much MASS ?
There are many who argue against an intelligent designer and creator of the Universe . One of the questions put forward
questioning an intelligent source to the Universe is " If God created man and also designed the Universe why did He create billions of other stars in the Universe ?"
But recent recent studies have demonstrated why the Universe is so vast ..............
----------
We now know that the overall mass of the universe is yet another one of those key factors necessary for life on Earth to be possible . With too much or too little mass in the universe the universe would be devoid of elements such as carbon , oxygen and nitrogen , which are crucial for the sustenance of life . Therefore , it appears that God created billions of stars so that life could exist on Earth .
Dr Hugh Ross , " Where did the Universe come from ? New scientific evidence for the existence of God ." Presented in South Barrington , Illinois , April 16 , 1994 .
----------
It must be noted that Dr Hugh Ross is a theistic evolutionary . BUT this does not negate what he says here .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html

Thursday, 24 May 2012

"Maybe some of us aren’t meant to survive, maybe some of us are meant to KILL OURSELVES….........."

"Maybe some of us aren’t meant to survive, maybe some of us are meant to KILL OURSELVES….........."
The theory of DEATH ( darwinian evolution ) offers no hope , but that which will catch us all in the end . This theory of death also promotes premature death , brought on by suicide . The theory of death will use any deception in order to propogate it's cull of Man who has been Created in The Image of God .
GENESIS 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. .
-----------
Gerard: ‘ ... I think that some people may have an inability to cope, and maybe this might sound a bit extreme, but that might be Darwinian theory, the Darwin theory of survival of the fittest. Maybe some of us aren’t meant to survive, maybe some of us are meant to kill ourselves …
‘There’s too many people in the world as it is. Maybe it is survival of the fittest, maybe some of us are meant to just give up, and maybe that would help the species.’
ABC (Australia) radio, Life Matters with Norman Swan, 4 May 2000: ‘Black Dog Days—The Experience and Treatment of Depression’
----------
Real LIFE can only be found in JESUS CHRIST ..........JOHN 14:6 Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.
JOHN 1:4 In him was life, and that life was the light of men.
JOHN 11:25 Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies ."

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-truth.html

Wednesday, 23 May 2012

THE ORIGIN OF FLIGHT........... ACCORDING TO EVOLUTIONISTS :

How , as land-dwelling creatures, did reptiles ever come to fly .This is an issue which has resulted in much speculation among evolutionists.
Two main theories are:
a) ancestors (reptiles) of birds descended to ground from trees. the reptiles lived in the treetops and came to possess wings gradually as they jumped from one branch to another. ARBOREAL THEORY.
b) Birds progressed to the air from the land. CURSORIAL (or "running") theory .
These theories are speculative interpretations, with no evidence to support either . Evolutionists SIMPLY IMAGINE that the evidence exists.

Professor John Ostrom, head of the Geology Department at Yale University, who proposed the cursorial theory :

NO FOSSIL evidence exists of any pro-avis. It is a PURE HYPOTHETICAL pre-bird, but one that must have existed.
John Ostrom, "Bird Flight: How Did It Begin?," American Scientist, January-February 1979, vol. 67, p. 47.
TOTAL IMAGINATION . The stuff fairytales are made from .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/flap-them-arms-you-will-not-see-results.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/fully-human-from-beginning.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/fossils-reject-darwins-tree-of-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/fossils-say-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/origins-of-vertebrates.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/dreams-and-visions-for-evolutionary.html

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE :

THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE :
The thought of The Universe having a beginning has struck fear into the hearts of many evolutionary scientists . For many centuries past , the debate as to whether or not The Universe had a beginning has raged on . BUT , why such a big deal ? The big deal will certainly be in the hand of those who say their is a Creator of The Universe if it can be demonstrated that indeed The Universe had a beginning , that is the big deal . There are many scientific evidences now demonstrating that INDEED The Universe had a beginning .....A moment when TIME , MATTER and ENERGY came into existence . Many still try to wriggle out of this event and dream up many non demonstratable theories because they wish to deliberately reject a CREATOR of The Universe and deny where the evidence is leading .
Alexander Vilenkin, Professor of Physics and Director of the Institute of Cosmology at Tufts University..........states , concerning the reality of the beginning of The Universe and how this will have to be faced by those who can not even consider the thought .
----------
Alexander Vilenkin :
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape, they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning (Many Worlds in One [New York: Hill and Wang, 2006], p.176).

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html

Sunday, 20 May 2012

Evolution cannot account for the structure of avian lungs.

AVIAN LUNGS :
Evolution cannot account for the structure of avian lungs, .
LAND DWELLING CREATURES ( Carnivorous Theropods ..Dinosaurs ) air flow is bidirectional. Inhaling, air travels through the passages in the lungs (bronchial tubes), ending in tiny air sacs (alveoli). Exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide takes place here. Exhaling..., this used air makes its way back and finds its way out of the lung by the same route.
BIRDS air is unidirectional. New air comes in one end, and used air goes at the other end. Special air sacs all along the passages between them, air flows in one direction through the avian lung. Therefore birds are able to take in air nonstop. This satisfies birds' high energy requirements.

Michael Denton in his book A Theory in Crisis:
In the case of birds, the major bronchi break down into tiny tubes which permeate the lung tissue. These so-called parabronchi eventually join up together again, forming a true circulatory system so that air flows in one direction through the lungs. ...[T]he structure of the lung in birds and the overall functioning of the respiratory system is quite unique. No lung in any other vertebrate species is known which in any way approaches the avian system. Moreover, it is identical in all essential details in birds as diverse as humming birds, ostriches and hawks.
Michael Denton, A Theory in Crisis, Adler & Adler, 1986, pp. 210-211

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/so-what-purpose-would-intermediate-lung.html

Saturday, 19 May 2012

Earth Geology explained by Global Flood :

"COME ON , THE MAJORITY OF GEOLOGIST'S ACCEPT THE EONS OF TIME INTERPRETATION FOR THE ROCKS ............SURELY ????????????? "
It is called evolutionary specs . funding , philosophical and ideological reasons . And the need to rid the science of Moses . Once the evolutionary proponents accept the rocks do not demonstrate and can not be explained as having been set down over billions of years then they have lost their billions of years , and they want their billions of years for their philosophical and ideological belief system . In many instances there are probably many more geologist's who are questioning the evolutionary timelines etc but for fear of reprisals , as can be demonstrated , they stay silent .
Clear a priori bias placed upon the geological evidence :

James Hutton ( 1785 )
‘the past history of our globe MUST BE EXPLAINED by what can be seen to be happening now … No powers are to be employed that are not natural to the globe, NO ACTION TO BE ADMITTED except those of which we know the principle’ ( caps added )
Hutton, J., ‘Theory of the Earth’, a paper (with the same title of his 1795 book) communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and published in Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1785; cited with approval in Holmes, A., Principles of Physical Geology, 2nd edition, Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., Great Britain, pp. 43–44, 1965. FREE SCIENCE FROM MOSES .

Charles Lyell's agenda was to.... “free the science from Moses”.
Bailey, E , British men of science: Charles Lyell, Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, London, Great Britain, 1962 p. 77-78. ....

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-truth.html

Friday, 18 May 2012

Darwinian tree planted in stony ground :

Darwinian tree planted in stony ground :
During the 1990s, research into the genetic codes of living things made worse the dillemma faced by the theory of evolution in this regard. In these experiments, "ribosomal RNA" (rRNA) sequences were compared. From the findings, evolutionist scientists goal was to establish an "evolutionary tree......." BUT , they were disappointed by the results.

-------

French biologists Hervé Philippe and Patrick Forterre, "with more and more sequences available, it turned out that most protein phylogenies contradict each other as well as the rRNA tree."
Hervé Philippe and Patrick Forterre, "The Rooting of the Universal Tree of Life is Not Reliable," Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol 49, 1999, p. 510.
Science, vol. 283, 1999, p. 2027
------
No consistent organismal phylogeny has emerged from the many individual protein phylogenies so far produced. Phylogenetic incongruities can be seen everywhere in the universal tree, from its root to the major branchings within and among the various [groups] to the makeup of the primary groupings themselves.
Carl Woese, "The Universel Ancestor," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, (1998) p. 6854.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/information-within-dna.html

Thursday, 17 May 2012

KNOW the difference between TRUE SCIENCE and FALSE SCIENCE :

KNOW the difference between TRUE SCIENCE and FALSE SCIENCE:
Repeatedly , again and again , we here " Science does not need a Creator , God is unscientific . " But , what those who make these claims are forgetting to mention is "what kind of science does not need a Creator and what kind of science makes God unscientific ?" Well , the kind of science making this claim is evolutionary science , the evolutionary paradigm is purely naturalistic and materialistic processes all by themselves over eons of time , with no goal directed purpose , producing what we observe within and including our Universe . This , is clearly , a deliberate rejection of a creator and would not need a Creator and would make God unscientific . BUT , modern science , the kind of science that is testable , repeatable and observable that enables us to study our Universe and all it contains clearly demonstrates ORDER , GOAL DIRECTED PURPOSES and COMPLEXITY . This true science has it's origins in men coming to the conclusion that there must be a creator and He has revealed Himself in His Creation .
-------------
C.S. LEWIS
‘Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Legislator. In most modern scientists this belief has died: it will be interesting to see how long their confidence in uniformity survives it. Two significant developments have already appeared—the hypothesis of a lawless sub-nature, and the surrender of the claim that science is true. We may be living nearer than we suppose to the end of the Scientific Age.’
Lewis, C.S., Miracles: a preliminary study, Collins, London, p. 110, 1947.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html

Wednesday, 16 May 2012

HUGE DRAGONS recorded and written about by Pliny The Elder.......

HUGE DRAGONS recorded and written about by Pliny The Elder , (Gaius Plinius Secundus ) 23 A.D to 79 A.D . Pliny The Elder was an author, naturalist, and natural philosopher as well as a naval and army commander of the early Roman Empire. In his book Natural History (Naturalis Historia) He records and describes what seem to be what we today call dinosaurs ............
BOOK EIGHT: CHAPTER . XI: "Elephants breed in that part of Affricke which lyeth beyond the deserts . India bringeth fouth the biggest: as also the dragons that are continually at variance with them, and evermore fighting, and those of such greatnesse, that they can easily claspe and wind round about the Elephants, and withall tye them fast with a knot. In this conflict they die, both the one and the other:"
"the Elephant hee falls downe dead as conquered, and with his heavie weight crusheth and squeaseth the dragon that his wound and wreathed about him."
CHAPTER XII: "...the dragons ware hereof, entangle and snarle his feet and legges first with their taile: the Elephants on the other side, undoe those knots wiht their trunke as with a hand....the principall thing the dragons make at is the eye . Now these dragons are so big withall, that they be able to receive all the Elephants bloud. Thus they are sucked drie, untill they fall down dead..."

CHAPTER XIII: "In Ethyopia there be as great dragons bred, as in India, namely twentie cubits long.(approx. 30 feet)

CHAPTER XIIII : "Megasthenes writeth, that there be serpents among the Indians to that bignesse, that they are able to swallow stags or buls all whole . Attilius Regulaus, generall under the Romanes, during the warres against the Carthaginians, assailed a Serpent neere the river Bagrada, which caried in length 120 foot..."
-----------------
COULD IT BE THAT DINO'S AND MAN ACTUALLY LIVED ALONGSIDE ONE ANOTHER , and very recently ?
Did these artists witness these animals for themselves ?
-------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the ......Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."
Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .

A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/After-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1

Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/sauropods-apatosaurus-dinosaur-depicted.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/mosasaurus-dinosaur-depicted-on-ancient.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/native-american-indians-witness-dinos.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/if-my-memory-serves-me-well-dino.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/800-year-old-stegosaurus-so-how-come.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/tanystropheus-dinosaur-depicted-on.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/flying-winged-reptiles-serpentsaccount.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/evidence-for-watery-catastrophe.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/chinese-lunar-year-year-of-dragon.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/dinos-embedded-in-chinese-culture.html

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

MEDIA BIAS ...............

MEDIA bias toward the supremacy of man's reasoning :
I have witnessed this many times on my tv screen , in my newspapers , on my radio . Man has elevated himself to be the reason for The Universe .
Proverbs 16:12 There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

‘Anyone who questions man’s reasoning, particularly on the origin of the physical world, faces an arrogance almost beyond comprehension. Many scientists realize the weak underpinnings of scientific models but the spokesmen of naturalism and their media advocates will not abide anything that questions either the supremacy of man, his reasoning power or his conclusions. I have seen media interviewers, who gladly try to tear Christian and conservative guests to pieces, grovel before a scientist who is [one of the] illuminati of evolutionary thought. No one would dare to try to question a living example of the superiority of man’s reasoning power. They are in the presence of a high priest of the one and only knowledge — let all the earth keep silent before him!’
Dr Emmett Williams, Creation Research Society Quarterly, 29(2):84, September 1992. .....

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-truth.html

Monday, 14 May 2012

EVIDENCE FOR A YOUNGER WORLD......CHANGING RADIOACTIVE DECAY RATES

Saturday, 12 May 2012

INFORMATION TO PRODUCE LIFE ............

“We now know that the secret of life lies not with the chemical ingredients as such, but with the logical structure and organisational arrangement of the
molecules . Like a supercomputer, life is an information processing system . It is the software of the living cell that is the real mystery, not the hardware.”
Davies, P . Life force, New Scientist 163(2204):27–30, ...18 September 1999
----------
So , how did matter develop a logical structure and organize molecules into the complex living organisms that inhabit our planet ?
Well , matter did not and could not achieve this , we know by what we observe that matter has no ability to organize itself into complex structures . The secret of life is in the hands of Him who created all things .
GENESIS 1:1 IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH

Friday, 11 May 2012

Status Photo Place Life Event How's it going, Steven? Friends See All Elizabeth Oneil Jean-Pierre Magloire Howard Roberts Howard Murphy Vincent McCann Ross Walker Steve Bradshaw Evelyn Cooke Steven Hughes 6 minutes ago IMPOSSIBILITY of DNA formation through NATURALISTIC processes :

The director of the German Federal Physics and Technology Institute, Prof. Werner Gitt,
There is no known law of nature, no known process and no known sequence of events which can cause information to originate by itself in matter...
Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, CLV, Bielefeld, Germany, pp. 107, 141.
-------------------...---------
It is impossible for the information inside DNA to have emerged by chance and natural processes. The blueprint of life , we call DNA , is precisely that a blueprint . All blueprints have to be there complete in order for it to be a blueprint . All living things have within them their own blueprint called DNA and without which , in its entirety from the start , there would be no way of any cell being able to produce the living things we see in the world today .
So where did the blueprint come from ? Well it is rather easy . Just like the designed products we use ie cars , houses , electrical items etc which all need a blueprint and that means intelligence is needed to produce the blueprint , so much more does the blueprint of DNA ( codes , language and meaning ) show a designer - intelligence - supreme mind - Creator of all things -
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html