In order to speak about the coming into being of the first star through the evolutionary process , we must go into the world of fantasy and pretense .
-------------
If there was no BIG BANG there certainly is no FIRST STAR and if there is no COLD DARK MATTER there is no BIG BANG and no FIRST STAR . So the evolutionary hypothesis of the FIRST STAR has been shown to be incorrect before the evidence is presented . But let us pretend that the BIG BANG happened and that COLD DARK MATTER DOES exist and let us see how much of a problem there is for the evolutionary FIRST STAR .
-------------
Star formation is shrouded in mystery . Generally speaking a star forms when a cloud of gas collapses under gravity . However , if the cloud is too hot , pressure will combat the effect of gravity and prevent the cloud from collapsing . So to form a star the gas cloud must have a way of cooling down .This is not as easy as it sounds . In todays Universe this is accomplished by a huge array of atoms necessary for making all but the simplest molecule - molecular hydrogen - have to be made inside stars . It is a chicken and egg situation .
New Scientist , 7 February 1998 , p 26-30
The truth is we do not understand star formation at a fundamental level .
Abraham Loeb , Harvard Center for Astrophysics , quoted in New Scientist , 7 Feb ,1998 , p26-30
--------------
But remember it could not have happened by the evolutionary method as there was no BIG BANG and no COLD DARK MATTER . Also remember the chicken and egg scenario concerning the molecules .
So bearing this quote in mind , why do evolutionary proponents still follow the deception . It is clear they are following pure imagination and hopefull so so stories ?
-------------
We have no direct evidence of how galaxies were formed , how the FIRST STARS formed without the help of the prior generations of stars , how galaxies evolved , whether they were formed from aggregations of smaller units or from sub-divisions of larger ones .
John Mather , NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbell , Maryland , USA in New Scientist , 7 Feb p26-30 .
------------
I say again :
But remember it could not have happened by the evolutionary method as there was no BIG BANG and no COLD DARK MATTER . Also remember the chicken and egg scenario concerning the molecules .
So bearing this quote in mind , why do evolutionary proponents still follow the deception . It is clear they are following pure imagination and hopefull so so stories .
..................................
Eric Lerner :
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities , things that we have never observed ......inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples ."
Eric Lerner , president of Lawrenceville plasma physics . Bucking the big bang , New Scientist 22/5/2004.
.................................
James Cline :
"Where did matter come from ? The best theories of the origins of the Universe still fail to explain how it managed not to turn up empty ."
James Cline , McGill University Physicist . American Scientist , March/April 2004 . P148 .
..................................
"An Open Letter To The Scientific Community."
Published in New Scientist May 22 , 2004 .
www.cosmologystatement.org
1 ) The big bang today relies on a GROWING NUMBER OF HYPOTHETICAL ENTITIES THINGS THAT WE HAVE NEVER OBSERVED = Inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples .
2) But the big bang theory CAN NOT SURVIVE without these FUDGE FACTORS .
3) What is more , the big bang theory can boast of NO QUANTATIVE PREDICTIONS THAT HAVE SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN VALIDATED BY OBSERVATION .
Initial signature = 33 scientist from 10 countries .
Subsequent signatures = 500
218 scientists and engineers
187 independent researchers
105 others .
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html
No comments:
Post a Comment