THE DECEPTION AND ILLUSION IS STILL BEING PROCLAIMED :

THE DECEPTION AND ILLUSION IS STILL BEING PROCLAIMED :
Billions of people have lived and died being told they came from an apelike common ancestor . This message has been and still is proclaimed by the evolutionary proponents as the TRUTH of who we are . The images that have been used to promote this propoganda show a smooth easy transition from a common ancestor to human . And with many false claims of having evidence to demonstrate this . But let us take a look at what is being said concerning this "ILLUSION." By leading evolutionists themselves.............
Bernard Wood , leading evolutionist :
There is a popular image of human evolution that you'll find all over the place ...On the left of the picture there is an ape . On the right , a man...Between the two is a succession of figures that become ever more like humans ...Our progress from ape to human looks so smooth , so tidy . It is such a beguiling image... that even the experts are loath to let it go . BUT IT IS AN ILLUSION ."
Bernard Wood , Who are we ? New Scientist 2366:44 ,26 October 2002 .

Bernard Wood is an evolutionist and does believe we have an apelike common ancestor . But He also is prepared to admit that the illusion of the smooth changeover from apes to humans is an illusion .

------
In reality , what we observe in the real world being used to support apelike common ancestry and the transition from supposed primitive humans to modern humans is a concoction of fossils and bones etc that clearly demonstrate the variation within humans , and should be labelled fully human , and not a progression from apelike common ancestors to where we are today . The variation we observe today in humans is vast but there are limits . If we stop and think for a moment about that variation ie small to large body sizes , small to large skull sizes ( with much variation ) , Deep black to pale pink skin colors . We can go on listing these differences between the human race but those differences are differences within the human race and demonstrates we are all part of one race ....The Human race .
The scientific evidence clearly supports what we read in The Bible concerning our Human family ancestry . Human from the beginning and all belonging to the same Human race .
MARK 10:6 Jesus Christ said "But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’"
GENESIS 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
ACTS 17:26 And has made of one blood all nations of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/false-evolutionary-jumping-claim-apes.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/deception-and-illusion-is-still-being.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/recent-common-ancestors-for-all.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/large-differences-in-dna-not-small-ones.html 

 

 

 

Religious , Philosphical and ideological explanation of what evolutionary theory concludes , all in one quote ......

Religious, Philosophical, and ideological explanation of what evolutionary theory concludes, all in one quote ......

‘We no longer feel ourselves to be guests in someone else’s home and therefore obliged to make our behaviour conform with a set of pre-existing cosmic rules. It is our creation now. We make the rules. We establish the parameters of reality. We create the world, and because we do, we no longer feel beholden to outside forces. We no longer have to justify our behaviour, for we are now the architects of the universe. We are responsible to nothing outside ourselves, for we are the kingdom, the power, and the glory forever and ever.’

Jeremy Rifkin, Algeny, p. 244 (Viking Press, New York), 1983.........

----------

During the last century many world leaders chose to opt for, man is "god" philosophy, and appealed to the fallen state of human morality. They ended up slaughtering millions and millions of innocent people in their quest to satisfy their corrupted, self-elevated moral values. So, for those who think this quote and religious, philosophical, and ideological world-view worth following then be prepared for the consequences. After all, by what and whose moral standard do we educate the children? Keep in mind that Britain the US and many other countries are responsible for telling their populace it is OK to commit mass murder in the very place of God-ordained protection, THE WOMB.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-truth.html 

Micro (minor variations) changes within living organisms are not the engine that ( according to evolutionary paradigm ) drives Macro changes in living organisms.

Micro (minor variations) changes within living organisms are not the engine that ( according to evolutionary paradigm ) drives Macro changes in living organisms.
---------
Roger Lewin stated during a conference on Macro evolution :
" The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution ."...
He answered , " The answer can be given as a clear..... No ."
Roger Lewin , Evolutionary theory under fire , Science , November 21st , 1980 , 883-887 .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/microevolution-does-not-lead-to.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/not-right-kind-of-change.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/no-biological-evolution-microbes-to.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/have-you-brains-to-work-this-out.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/survival-of-fittest-not-arrival-of.html

SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST NOT THE ARRIVAL OF THE FITTEST :

SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST NOT THE ARRIVAL OF THE FITTEST .
“… starting in the 1970s, many biologists began questioning its adequacy in explaining evolution. Genetics might be adequate for explaining microevolution, but microevolutionary changes in gene frequency were not seen as able to turn a reptile into a mammal or to convert a fish into an amphibian. Microevolution looks at adaptations that concern the survival of the fittest, not the arrival of the fittest. As Goodwin points out, ‘the origins of species—Darwin’s problem—remains unsolved.’ ”
Gilbert, Scott et al., Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Developmental Biology 173:357’372, 1996.
-----------------
Yes , that deceptively named ( microevolution ) process that gives us the variation we have within living organisms will in no way get fish to fishermen , simpler cells to more complex cells , microbes to microbiologists .
This kind of change will only ever produce humans with variation , wolf with variation ie dogs , horses with variation , birds with variation etc .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/microevolution-does-not-lead-to.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/micro-minor-variations-changes-within.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/not-right-kind-of-change.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/no-biological-evolution-microbes-to.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/have-you-brains-to-work-this-out.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/just-how-tall-can-we-go.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/survival-of-fittest-not-arrival-of.html 

NO biological evolution (microbes to microbiologist) . BACTERIA demonstrates this :

"NO" biological evolution (microbes to microbiologist), BACTERIA demonstrates this .
There are some evolutionary biologists who claim they cannot observe the evolutionary effect of biological mutation mechanisms since these mechanisms take place only over an extended period of time. However, this argument is baseless , in that it lacks any scientific foundation . A scientist , during their lifetime can observe thousands of generations of living things with short life spans ie fruit flies or bacteria, and still observe "NO EVOLUTION" .


Pierre-Paul Grassé states the following about the unchanging nature of bacteria, a fact which invalidates evolution:
... Bacteria are the organisms which, because of their huge numbers, produce the most mutants. [B]acteria exhibit a great fidelity to their species. The bacillus Escherichia coli, whose mutants have been studied very carefully, is the best example. The reader will agree that it is surprising, to say the least, to want to prove evolution and to discover its mechanisms and then to choose as a material for this study a being which practically stabilized a billion years ago! What is the use of their unceasing mutations, if they do not [produce evolutionary] change? In sum, the mutations of bacteria and viruses are merely hereditary fluctuations around a median position; a swing to the right, a swing to the left, but no final evolutionary effect. Cockroaches, which are one of the most venerable living insect groups, have remained more or less unchanged since the Permian, yet they have undergone as many mutations as Drosophila, a Tertiary insect
Pierre-Paul Grassé, Evolution of Living Organisms, Academic Press, New York, 1977, p. 87

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-matter-how-numerous-they-may-be.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/evolutionary-contradictory-claim.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/genetic-mutations-say-no-to-increasing.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/mutations-do-not-produce-any-kind-of.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/fruit-fly-yes-fruit-fly-you-mean-fruit.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/zero-probability.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/genetics-say-no-to-macro-evolutionary.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.htmlhttp://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html

Wild guesses and hunches .................

Many ( if not all......???? ) evolutionary scientists , have a pre conceived belief and an evolutionary bias towards explaining the world through naturalistic processes over eons of time and eons of chance and eons of matter . A bit like rigging a talent contest because they want the cutest looking person to win .
-------------
Boyce Rensberger :...
"At this point, it is necessary to reveal a little inside information about how scientists work, something the textbooks don't usually tell you. The fact is that scientists are not really as objective and dispassionate in their work as they would like you to think. Most scientists first get their ideas about how the world works not through rigorously logical processes but through hunches and wild guesses. As individuals they often come to believe something to be true long before they assemble the hard evidence that will convince somebody else that it is. Motivated by faith in his own ideas and a desire for acceptance by his peers, a scientist will labor for years knowing in his heart that his theory is correct but devising experiment after experiment whose results he hopes will support his position."
Boyce Rensberger, How the World Works, William Morrow, NY, 1986, pp. 17–18. Rensberger is an ardently anti-creationist science writer.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/whos-rulesmans-or-gods.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/ideology-of-lifes-origins-sssshhhhh.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/religious-philosphical-and-ideological.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/rag-of-hypothesis.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/free-science-from-moses.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/geology-assuredly-does-not-reveal-any.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-to-gradualism-over-eons-of-time.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/darkened-evolutionary-specs-firmly-in.html

 

The only biology that has proceeded in the light of evolutionary paradigm is evolutionary biology itself :

How many times have we heard that we need to understand biology in the light of evolutionary paradigm ? How many times have we heard that understanding the biology of complex living organisms through an evolutionary mindset has led to many medical breadthrough's ? And claims of a similar standing in an attempt to claim that The evolutionary paradigm is making sense of our world .
Well it seems to me that those who are in the know are not in agreement with those who are claiming the above .
Dr Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated: “In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.”
Dizikes, P, Missing Links, Boston Globe, 23 October 2005 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/origins-of-lifeimpossiblity-of.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/biological-research-in-light-without.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/evolution-not-taken-into-account.html 

 

 

 

 

COLD DARK MATTER : Let us just pretend for a short while , that the BIG BANG did happen .

COLD DARK MATTER : Let us just pretend for a short while , that the BIG BANG did happen .
Now , once the supposed BIG BANG has happened , according to Newton's well tried Law's of motion , all the subatomic particles would fly apart and seperate and continue to do so at great speed . So how can these particles then coalesce (come together ) to form atoms , molecules , nebulae , stars and galaxies ? By what mechanism could they lose energy and cool down ?
Well Cosmologists have invented an unseen form of matter to supply the gravitational force required to coalesce (bring together ) the particles . As it can not be detected , it has been called COLD DARK MATTER . It is calculated that to satisfy the demands of the BIG BANG THEORY , COLD DARK MATTER would have to comprise some 95-99 percent of the total matter in the Universe . ( considering it has never been found and can not be detected , THAT IS A BIG ASK )
------------
"Cosmologists have fitted their theoretical universes with some kind of invisible dark matter , to help galaxies to form . But for dark matter nor for inflation is there true independent support outside the cosmological arena for which they were invented ."
NATURE 30th April , 1992 , page 731
------------
" Nobody has detected any such dark matter particles so the case is still open ."
New Scientist , 29 March , 2001 , page 24 .
-----------
DARK MATTER , may not exist , according to an international team of astronomers who have used an X ray satellite to count galaxy clusters in the early universe . If they are right , the expansion of the universe is not speeding up and the scientific community has been taken in by a HUGE COSMIC MIRAGE "
New Scientist , 6th December , 2003 , page 10 .

...........

Eric Lerner :
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities , things that we have never observed ......inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples ."
Eric Lerner , president of Lawrenceville plasma physics . Bucking the big bang , New Scientist 22/5/2004.

..........

James Cline :
"Where did matter come from ? The best theories of the origins of the Universe still fail to explain how it managed  not to turn up empty ."
James Cline , McGill University Physicist . American Scientist , March/April 2004 . P148 .

..........

 "An Open Letter To The Scientific Community."
Published in New Scientist May 22 , 2004 .
www.cosmologystatement.org

1 ) The big bang today relies on a GROWING NUMBER OF HYPOTHETICAL ENTITIES THINGS THAT WE HAVE NEVER OBSERVED = Inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples .
2) But the big bang theory CAN NOT SURVIVE without these FUDGE FACTORS .
3) What is more , the big bang theory can boast of NO QUANTATIVE PREDICTIONS THAT HAVE SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN VALIDATED BY OBSERVATION .

Innitial signature = 33 scientist from 10 countries .

Subsequent signatures = 500
218 scientists and engineers
187 independent researchers
105 others .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html 

THE FIRST STAR .................

THE FIRST STAR .................
In order to speak about the coming into being of the first star through the evolutionary process , we must go into the world of fantasy and pretense .
-------------
If there was no BIG BANG there certainly is no FIRST STAR and if there is no COLD DARK MATTER there is no BIG BANG and no FIRST STAR . So the evolutionary hypothesis of the FIRST STAR has been shown to be incorrect before the evidence is presented . But let us pretend that the BIG BANG happened and that COLD DARK MATTER DOES exist and let us see how much of a problem there is for the evolutionary FIRST STAR .
-------------
Star formation is shrouded in mystery . Generally speaking a star forms when a cloud of gas collapses under gravity . However , if the cloud is too hot , pressure will combat the effect of gravity and prevent the cloud from collapsing . So to form a star the gas cloud must have a way of cooling down .This is not as easy as it sounds . In todays Universe this is accomplished by a huge array of atoms necessary for making all but the simplest molecule - molecular hydrogen - have to be made inside stars . It is a chicken and egg situation .
New Scientist , 7 February 1998 , p 26-30

The truth is we do not understand star formation at a fundamental level .
Abraham Loeb , Harvard Center for Astrophysics , quoted in New Scientist , 7 Feb ,1998 , p26-30
--------------
But remember it could not have happened by the evolutionary method as there was no BIG BANG and no COLD DARK MATTER . Also remember the chicken and egg scenario concerning the molecules .
So bearing this quote in mind , why do evolutionary proponents still follow the deception . It is clear they are following pure imagination and hopefull so so stories ?
-------------
We have no direct evidence of how galaxies were formed , how the FIRST STARS formed without the help of the prior generations of stars , how galaxies evolved , whether they were formed from aggregations of smaller units or from sub-divisions of larger ones .
John Mather , NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbell , Maryland , USA in New Scientist , 7 Feb p26-30 .
------------
I say again :
But remember it could not have happened by the evolutionary method as there was no BIG BANG and no COLD DARK MATTER . Also remember the chicken and egg scenario concerning the molecules .
So bearing this quote in mind , why do evolutionary proponents still follow the deception . It is clear they are following pure imagination and hopefull so so stories .
 ..................................

Eric Lerner :
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities , things that we have never observed ......inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples ."
Eric Lerner , president of Lawrenceville plasma physics . Bucking the big bang , New Scientist 22/5/2004.

.................................

James Cline :
"Where did matter come from ? The best theories of the origins of the Universe still fail to explain how it managed not to turn up empty ."
James Cline , McGill University Physicist . American Scientist , March/April 2004 . P148 .
..................................
 "An Open Letter To The Scientific Community."
Published in New Scientist May 22 , 2004 .
www.cosmologystatement.org

1 ) The big bang today relies on a GROWING NUMBER OF HYPOTHETICAL ENTITIES THINGS THAT WE HAVE NEVER OBSERVED = Inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples .
2) But the big bang theory CAN NOT SURVIVE without these FUDGE FACTORS .
3) What is more , the big bang theory can boast of NO QUANTATIVE PREDICTIONS THAT HAVE SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN VALIDATED BY OBSERVATION .

Initial signature = 33 scientist from 10 countries .

Subsequent signatures = 500
218 scientists and engineers
187 independent researchers
105 others .



http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html 
 

BIG BANG . Cosmological foolishness............Not logical after all .

COSMOLOGICAL FOOLISHNESS............Not logical after all .
BIG BANG THEORY : Is the story of origins , which proposes in the dim and distant past , approximately 12 billion years ago (open to slight variation AND according to evolutionary timelines ) there was  NOTHING . This NOTHING became unstable and exploded . Space itself was made and expanded very rapidly .
There are several difficulties with the theory :
1 First Law of Thermodynamics states = Matter and Energy cannot be created by NOTHING.
2 Quantum Perturbation of energy cannot be used to explain the production of the cosmic egg , because one has then to explain the source of the energy .
3 Orderly Universe = The orderly progress of the heavenly bodies is used for measuring Time , months , years . Order does not come from an explosion . And the claimed explosion would only produce chaos .
4 Information = Matter and Energy alone can not produce information . Matter is a medium for information and the information has to be intelligently inserted ( codes , languages , meaning DNA etc )
5 Second Law of Thermodynamics = All spontaneous changes result in a loss of order and information . An increase in entropy .
6 Energy alone , without information to direct it , cannot increase order . Proverbial bull in a China shop springs to mind . And that is what happens with undirected energy ... Chaos not order . But we live in an orderly Universe .
------------------------
Don't let the cosmologists try to kid you on this one. They have not got a clue either-despite the fact that they are doing a pretty good job of convincing themselves and others that this is really not a problem.
"In the beginning," they will say, "there was nothing-no time, space, matter or energy. Then there was a quantum fluctuation from which..." Whoa! Stop right there. You see what I mean?
First there is nothing then there is something. And the cosmologists try to bridge the two with a quantum flutter, a tremor of uncertainty that sparks it all off.Then they are away and before you know it, they have pulled a hundred billion galaxies out of their quantum hats. I may not have been born in Yorkshire but I'm a firm believer that you cannot get owt for nowt .
there is a very real problem in explaining how it got started in the first place.
David Darling , New Scientist , 1996 Page 49 .
Do not let the cosmologists fool you .

..................................

Eric Lerner :
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities , things that we have never observed ......inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples ."
Eric Lerner , president of Lawrenceville plasma physics . Bucking the big bang , New Scientist 22/5/2004.

.................................

James Cline :
"Where did matter come from ? The best theories of the origins of the Universe still fail to explain how it managed  not to turn up empty ."
James Cline , McGill University Physicist . American Scientist , March/April 2004 . P148 .

..................................

All science and history would collapse if this law of cause and effect were denied. So would all law enforcement, if the police didn’t think they needed to find a cause for a stabbed body or a burgled house. Also, the universe cannot be self-caused—nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity.
-----------------------
 "An Open Letter To The Scientific Community."
Published in New Scientist May 22 , 2004 .
http://homepages.xnet.co.nz/~hardy/cosmologystatement.html

1 ) The big bang today relies on a GROWING NUMBER OF HYPOTHETICAL ENTITIES THINGS THAT WE HAVE NEVER OBSERVED = Inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples .
2) But the big bang theory CAN NOT SURVIVE without these FUDGE FACTORS .
3) What is more , the big bang theory can boast of NO QUANTATIVE PREDICTIONS THAT HAVE SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN VALIDATED BY OBSERVATION . 

Initial signature = 33 scientist from 10 countries .

Subsequent signatures = 500
218 scientists and engineers
187 independent researchers
105 others .



http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html
http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j12_1/j12_1_20-22.pdf

DARWINISM and EVOLUTION Lead to RACISM , always has done and always will do .

DARWINISM and EVOLUTION Lead to RACISM , always has done and always will do .
In probably the worlds most famous church , Westminster Abbey , there sits , rather ironically , the marble bust of Reverend Charles Kingsley ( 1819-1875 ) . This gentlemen , in the latter half of the 19th century , abandoned faith in Christ as Creator of humanity for a faith in Darwinism . This led him to believe , due to his Darwinist and evolutionary belief system , that some people are less evolved than others . It also led him to make the following comments .
Rev Charles Kingsley
" ‘The Black People of Australia, exactly the same race as the African Negro, cannot take in the Gospel . All attempts to bring them to a knowledge of the true God have as yet failed utterly … Poor brutes in human shape they must perish off the face of the earth like brute beasts.’
11. Kingsley, C, Sermons on National Subjects, Sermon XLI, Macmillan & Co., pp. 414–17, 1880, cited in Ref. 12.
12. John G. Paton, Autobiography, ed. by Paton, J., Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh, pp. 263–65, 1965.

Rev Charles Kingsley was wrong concerning the Australian Aborigines as well as his premature rejection of the Genesis account of creation in favour of Darwinism and evolution .

--------

REVELATION 5:9 And they sang a new song, saying, “Worthy are you to take the scroll and to open its seals, for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God from every TRIBE and LANGUAGE and PEOPLE and NATION .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/leading-evolutionist-accepts-racism-has.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/darwinism-and-nazi-race-holocaust.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/evolutionary-religious-research.html

Christian fundamentalists responsible for anti slavery movement :

Christian fundamentalists responsible for anti slavery movement :
‘The anti-slavery movement was spearheaded by people who would today be called “the religious right” and its organization was created by conservative businessmen. Moreover, what destroyed slavery in the non-Western world was Western imperialism.’ ‘Nothing could be more jolting and discordant with the vision of today’s intellectuals than the fact that it was businessmen, devout religious leaders and Western imperialists who together destroyed slavery around the world.’
Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire’s Slaves by Adam Hochschild (2005).
---------
Christianity and followers of Jesus Christ ( True followers ) ensured that slavery was abolished . It took more than man and his claims of enlightenment to finally make slavery illegal , it took The Word of God and those who proclaimed The Words of Him who created all things .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/what-it-took-to-defeat-slavery.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/christian-fundamentalists-responsible.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/slave-is-not-really-person.html 

 

 

 

Darkened evolutionary specs firmly in place before looking .............

CLEAR BIAS IMPOSED UPON THE GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE BEFORE THE EVIDENCE IS EXAMINED :
The a priori ( previously assumed ) battle cry and call to arms for the interpretation of the geological record , as being laid down over billions of years  with present day happenings ( Uniformitarianism ) being the standard of measurement through all ages over eons of time was sounded out by " the founder of modern geology " James Hutton . The date for this call was 1785 , well before the evidence was examined . This is a classic case of imposing a clear , unswerving or moving deliberate ideology upon how the evidence will be interpreted no matter what the evidence is demonstrating to the contrary .
.....srh
-------
James Hutton ( 1785 )
‘the past history of our globe MUST BE EXPLAINED by what can be seen to be happening now … No powers are to be employed that are not natural to the globe, NO ACTION TO BE ADMITTED except those of which we know the principle’ ( caps added )
Hutton, J., ‘Theory of the Earth’, a paper (with the same title of his 1795 book) communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and published in Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1785; cited with approval in Holmes, A., Principles of Physical Geology, 2nd edition, Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., Great Britain, pp. 43–44, 1965.

Clearly , James Hutton , had a Philosophical , ideological and religious agenda that he followed and which he encouraged others to follow . He also felt he did not need to adhere to the rulebook of the classic definition of science , therefore MAKING HIS OWN RULES .

Science - The search for truth (whatever that truth may be) through the scientific method of repeated experimentation and observation . 

Definition of Religion :
.......A set of beliefs concerning the cause , nature and purpose of the Universe......
The Random House College Dictionary 1982 p1114 . 

Now tell me evolutionary paradigm is not a religion , because they certainly do have a belief that materialism is all that is needed to produce this Universe and all the complex living organisms that are within it . They certainly can not demonstrate their worldview :

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/whos-rulesmans-or-gods.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/ideology-of-lifes-origins-sssshhhhh.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/religious-philosphical-and-ideological.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/rag-of-hypothesis.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/free-science-from-moses.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/geology-assuredly-does-not-reveal-any.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-to-gradualism-over-eons-of-time.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/darkened-evolutionary-specs-firmly-in.html 

 

No detailed cellular evolutionary account to call upon ...........

Evolutionary biochemist Franklin Harold wrote, “we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.”
Harold, Franklin M. (Prof. Emeritus Biochemistry, Colorado State University) The way of the cell: molecules, organisms and the order of life, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001, p. 205.
------------
Yes , but it must have happened because we have millions and millions of complex living organisms that have arisen from a simpler cell swamping our planet .
Pssssssssssss "Do not tell anyone we have not got a clue , neither can we demonstrate how this has happened or is happening ."

Definition of Religion :
.......A set of beliefs concerning the cause , nature and purpose of the Universe......
The Random House College Dictionary 1982 p1114 .

Now tell me evolutionary paradigm is not a religion , because they certainly do have a belief that materialism is all that is needed to produce this Universe and all the complex living organisms that are within it . They certainly can not demonstrate their worldview :


http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/boiled-broth.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/ideology-of-lifes-origins-sssshhhhh.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/confession-of-ignorance-when-it-comes.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/special-origins.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/faith-based-origins.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/life-needs-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/creative-ability-of-raw-energy.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/blowing-out-of-tune-trumpet_15.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/order-and-complexity-clearly-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-matter-how-numerous-they-may-be.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/origins-of-lifeimpossiblity-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/please-stay-silent-or-we-will-lose.html

FAITH based origins .......

FAITH based origins .......
“The belief that life on earth arose spontaneously from non-living matter, is simply
a matter of faith in strict reductionism and is based entirely on ideology.”
Hubert P. Yockey, 1992 (a non-creationist). Information Theory and Molecular Biology, Cambridge University Press, UK, p. 284.
-------------
... No spontaneous arrival of life from non living matter = No biological evolution .

Variation ( named micro evolution - in order to deceive the masses into thinking it will get a fish to a fishermen , eventually ) within genes , that are being selected from IS NOT the kind of change that would add anything new to the biosphere , microbe to microbiologist , which is required in order to get a simpler single celled organism to the variety of living complex organisms that inhabit our planet today .

Definition of Religion :
.......A set of beliefs concerning the cause , nature and purpose of the Universe......
The Random House College Dictionary 1982 p1114 .

Now tell me evolutionary paradigm is not a religion , because they certainly do have a belief that materialism is all that is needed to produce this Universe and all the complex living organisms that are within it . They certainly can not demonstrate their worldview .

 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/origins-of-lifeimpossiblity-of.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/boiled-broth.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/ideology-of-lifes-origins-sssshhhhh.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/confession-of-ignorance-when-it-comes.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/special-origins.html  

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/life-needs-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/creative-ability-of-raw-energy.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/blowing-out-of-tune-trumpet_15.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/order-and-complexity-clearly-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-matter-how-numerous-they-may-be.html  

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/origins-of-lifeimpossiblity-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/please-stay-silent-or-we-will-lose.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/boiled-broth.html  

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/ideology-of-lifes-origins-sssshhhhh.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/confession-of-ignorance-when-it-comes.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/special-origins.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/faith-based-origins.html 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/life-needs-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/creative-ability-of-raw-energy.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/blowing-out-of-tune-trumpet_15.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/order-and-complexity-clearly-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-matter-how-numerous-they-may-be.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/origins-of-lifeimpossiblity-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/please-stay-silent-or-we-will-lose.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/faith-based-origins.html 

 

Origins of life.....IMPOSSIBLITY OF BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION

IMPOSSIBILITY OF BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION :
If one step in the evolutionary process is proven to be impossible, this will demonstrate that the whole theory is false and invalid.
By proving that the haphazard formation of proteins is impossible, all other claims of evolution are also refuted. It then becomes meaningless to take some human and ape skulls and engage in speculation about them. Evolutionists did not want to mention how living organisms came into existence out of nonliving matter for a long time. This question, which had constantly been avoided, eventually had to be addressed . A series of experiments in the second quarter of the twentieth century were carried out . Main question was: How could the first living cell have appeared in the primordial atmosphere on the earth? What kind of explanation could evolutionists offer?
Russian biologist Alexander I. Oparin, the founder of the concept of "chemical evolution." Despite all his theoretical studies, Oparin was unable to produce any results to shed light on the origin of life. He says the following in his book The Origin of Life, published in 1936:
"Unfortunately, however, the problem of the origin of the cell is perhaps the most obscure point in the whole study of the evolution of organisms."
Alexander I. Oparin, Origin of Life, Dover Publications, NewYork, 1936, 1953 (reprint), p. 196 .

And for you who seem to get bogged down concerning dates claiming anything that is older than them is outdated and since then we have made great advancements in this and that ....well you are wrong .
After all , origin of species ....1859 . Now that is well and truly outdated and has been shown to be in total error in the light of modern  testable , repeatable , experimental and observable science .

Professor Klaus Dose, president, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Johannes Gutenberg :
More than 30 years of experimentation on the origin of life in the fields of chemical and molecular evolution have led to a better perception of the immensity of the problem of the origin of life on earth rather than to its solution. At present all discussions on principal theories and experiments in the field either end in stalemate or in a confession of ignorance.
Klaus Dose, "The Origin of Life: More Questions Than Answers," Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, vol. 13, no. 4, 1988, p. 348.

Evolutionary science writer , John Horgan @
This is by far the weakest strut of the chassis of modern biology."
Horgan, John, The End of Science, MA Addison-Wesley, 1996, p. 138.

Geochemist Jeffrey Bada :
Today, as we leave the twentieth century, we still face the biggest unsolved problem that we had when we entered the twentieth century: How did life originate on Earth?
Jeffrey Bada, "Life's Crucible," Earth, February 1998, p. 40. ....
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/boiled-broth.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/ideology-of-lifes-origins-sssshhhhh.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/confession-of-ignorance-when-it-comes.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/special-origins.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/faith-based-origins.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/life-needs-life.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/creative-ability-of-raw-energy.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/blowing-out-of-tune-trumpet_15.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/order-and-complexity-clearly-no.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-matter-how-numerous-they-may-be.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/origins-of-lifeimpossiblity-of.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/please-stay-silent-or-we-will-lose.html 

ALL living organisms have been CREATED by an INTELLIGENT source :

All living organisms were created. THIS IS NOT A DOGMATIC BELIEVE LIKE MATERIALSIM , but the result of SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION and EXPERIMENT.
Michael J Behe states :
The resulting realization that life was designed by an intelligence is a shock to us in the twentieth century who have gotten used to thinking of life as the result of simple natural laws. But other centuries have had their shocks, and there is no reason to suppose that we should escape them.
396 Michael J. Behe, Darwin's Black Box, The Free Press, New York, 1996, pp. 252-53

 

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/information-within-dna.html

THE ORIGIN OF FLIGHT........... ACCORDING TO EVOLUTIONISTS :

THE ORIGIN OF FLIGHT........... ACCORDING TO EVOLUTIONISTS :
How , as land-dwelling creatures, did reptiles ever come to fly ? This is an issue which has resulted in much speculation among evolutionists.
Two main theories are:
a) ancestors (reptiles) of birds descended to ground from trees. the reptiles lived in the treetops and came to possess wings gradually as they jumped from one branch to another. ARBOREAL THEORY.
b) Birds progressed to the air from the land. CURSORIAL (or "running") theory .

These theories are speculative interpretations, with no evidence to support either . Evolutionists , SIMPLY , IMAGINE that the evidence exists.

Professor John Ostrom, head of the Geology Department at Yale University, who proposed the cursorial theory states :
NO FOSSIL evidence exists of any pro-avis. It is a PURE HYPOTHETICAL pre-bird, but one that must have existed.
John Ostrom, "Bird Flight: How Did It Begin?," American Scientist, January-February 1979, vol. 67, p. 47.
TOTAL IMAGINATION . The stuff fairytales are made from .


http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/flap-them-arms-you-will-not-see-results.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/fully-human-from-beginning.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/fossils-reject-darwins-tree-of-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/fossils-say-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/origins-of-vertebrates.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/dreams-and-visions-for-evolutionary.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/green-machine.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/best-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/winged-insects-suddenly-appear.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/it-means-what-it-says.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/spiders-millipedes-etc-suddenly-appear.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/planted-by-designer.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/it-never-seemed-to-happen.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/millions-of-dead-things-buried-in-mud.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/origin-of-reptiles.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/made-ape-of-homo-habilis.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/cambrian-big-bang.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/biological-boom-of-cambrian.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/cambrian-explosion-clearly-demonstrates.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/darwin-was-right-fatal-to-theory-is-in.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/fossil-record-clearly-supports-creation.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-fast-can-evolution-get.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/and-what-i-like-to-ask-my-biologist.html 
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/03/marine-reptiles-can-not-be-credibly.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/special-origins.html