The POSSIBILITIES are endless .........................

Richard Dawkins admits to the POSSIBLE evidence of an intelligent signature ( evidence for design and intelligence ) within DNA . And states that if so then it could have been aliens who seeded it on Earth . Here is me thinking that Mr Dawkins thought evidence for design is an illusion .......

 Richard Dawkins went on to make excuses for his acceptance for the possiblities that there is an argument for an intelligent signature in DNA , and also for his acceptance that there is an argument for the possiblities of alien intelligence having , in the past , seeded life on this planet .

 

Rather a shabby attempt of damage limitation :

Well that is a backtrack from Richard Dawkins if I ever I saw one . Note he does not deny what he said .....Because he clearly said it . I heard it and so did millions of others .And using a vaque excuse like " I tried to give intelligent design its best shot ." Strange how such an intelligent fella could have been fooled into doing this interview . And then claiming he had never heard of Ben Stein .........What a laugh. And using the quote from Bertrand Russel asking why God took great pains to hide himself .....Well come on , God became a man , has given us His Word , has given us a created Universe which clearly demonstrates design and purpose . Using someones kindness against them is plain evil ....................What trash again , pure damage limitation exercise .

It must be stated  : The point being made and from Richard Dawkins himself , is the POSSIBILITY . You will note that the word POSSIBLE , followed by evidence of an intelligent signature within DNA , is the wording of the comment posted . What Richard Dawkins truly thinks is sealed within his own mind and only he and The Creator of all things knows this . "Not what he intended to say ..........?" But he said it and it is in context to what he said . Remember .......POSSIBLE ...
Definition of the Word POSSIBILITY or POSSIBLE .Something that may be true or may be the case.............

As Ben Stein summarized :
" Professor Dawkins was not against intelligent design , just certain types of designers , such as , GOD ."
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html