Be The Voice - Gen1Rev22: September 2011

Friday 30 September 2011

Darwinian daydreamers ............

Reality does not allow for the daydreaming of the Darwinian theory .
Evolutionist Pierre-Paul Grassé :
The opportune appearance of mutations permitting animals and plants to meet their needs seems hard to believe. Yet the Darwinian theory is even more demanding: A single plant, a single animal would require thousands and thousands of lucky, appropriate events. Thus, miracles would become the rule: events with an infinitesimal probability could not fail to occur There is no law against daydreaming, but science must not indulge in it.
Pierre-P Grassé, Evolution of Living Organisms, Academic Press, New York, 1977, p. 103.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/no-matter-how-numerous-they-may-be.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/evolutionary-contradictory-claim.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/genetic-mutations-say-no-to-increasing.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/mutations-do-not-produce-any-kind-of.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/fruit-fly-yes-fruit-fly-you-mean-fruit.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/zero-probability.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/genetics-say-no-to-macro-evolutionary.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/darwin-was-right-and-gould-knew-it-data.html

Tuesday 27 September 2011

"Do not let the children think critically ".......Say the evolutionists .

Leading evolutionist Eugene Scott , leader of the anti creationist National Center for Science Education , clearly , states that to present to children of different ages etc , criticism of evolution then they may not believe evolution . Clearly , those in the know , the pied pipers of the evolutionary paradigm , understand the implications for their evolutinary worldview when it is exposed to scrutiny .
Eugene Scott :
“In my opinion, using creation and evolution as topics for critical-thinking exercises in primary and secondary schools is virtually guaranteed to confuse students about evolution and may lead them to reject one of the major themes in science.”
Larry Witham, Where Darwin Meets the Bible, p. 23, Oxford University Press, 2002.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/get-to-children.html

------------------

THE INTOLERANT ATHEIST RADICALS attack Christian school :
TEACHER teaches and tests the children about the true history of the world by using the No1 history book of the world . The school also teaches the incorrect interpretation of our world that the atheistic evolutionary radicals have faith in .

http://www.foxcarolina.com/story/22136794/upstate-schools-science-quiz-sparks-controversey

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2013/04/30/atheists-attack-christian-school

http://www.brca.us/

Monday 26 September 2011

THE ABORTED CHILD TELLS HIS STORY :

THE ABORTED CHILD TELLS HIS SIDE :

Hi Mummy.

I'm your baby. You don't know me yet, I'm only a few weeks old. You're going to find out about me soon, though, I promise. Let me tell you some things about me. My name is John, and I've got beautiful brown eyes and black hair. Well, I don't have it yet, but I will when I'm born. I'm going to be your only child, and you'll call me your one and only. I'm going to grow up without a daddy mostly, but we have each other. We'll help each other, and love each other. I want to be a doctor when I grow up.

... You found out about me today, Mommy! You were so excited, you couldn't wait to tell everyone. All you could do all day was smile, and life was perfect. You have a beautiful smile, Mommy. It will be the first face I will see in my life, and it will be the best thing I see in my life. I know it already.
... ... ... ...
Today was the day you told Daddy. You were so excited to tell him about me! ...He wasn't happy, Mommy. He kind of got angry. I don't think that you noticed, but he did. He started to talk about something called wedlock, and money, and bills, and stuff I don't think I understand yet. You were still happy, though, so it was okay. Then he did something scary, Mommy. He hit you. I could feel you fall backward, and your hands flying up to protect me. I was okay... but I was very sad for you. You were crying then, Mommy. That's a sound I don't like. It doesn't make me feel good. It made me cry, too. He said sorry after, and he hugged you again. You forgave him, Mommy, but I'm not sure if I do. It wasn't right. You say he loves you... why would he hurt you? I don't like it, Mommy.

Finally, you can see me! Your stomach is a little bit bigger, and you're so proud of me! You went out with your mommy to buy new clothes, and you were so so so happy. You sing to me, too. You have the most beautiful voice in the whole wide world. When you sing is when I'm happiest. And you talk to me, and I feel safe. So safe. You just wait and see, Mommy. When I am born I will be perfect just for you. I will make you proud, and I will love you with all of my heart.

I can move my hands and feet now, Mommy. I do it because you put your hands on your belly to feel me, and I giggle. You giggle, too. I love you, Mommy.

Daddy came to see you today, Mommy. I got really scared. He was acting funny and he wasn't talking right. He said he didn't want you. I don't know why, but that's what he said. And he hit you again. I got angry, Mommy. When I grow up I promise I won't let you get hurt! I promise to protect you. Daddy is bad. I don't care if you think that he is a good person, I think he's bad. But he hit you, and he said he didn't want us. He doesn't like me. Why doesn't he like me, Mommy?

You didn't talk to me tonight, Mommy. Is everything okay?

It's been three days since you saw Daddy. You haven't talked to me or touched me or anything since that. Don't you still love me, Mommy? I still love you. I think you feel sad. The only time I feel you is when you sleep. You sleep funny, kind of curled up on your side. And you hug me with your arms, and I feel safe and warm again. Why don't you do that when you're awake, any more?

I'm 21 weeks old today, Mommy. Aren't you proud of me? We're going somewhere today, and it's somewhere new. I'm excited. It looks like a hospital, too. I want to be a doctor when I grow up, Mommy. Did I tell you that? I hope you're as excited as I am. I can't wait.

...Mommy, I'm getting scared. Your heart is still beating, but I don't know what you are thinking. The doctor is talking to you. I think something's going to happen soon. I'm really, really, really scared, Mommy. Please tell me you love me. Then I will feel safe again. I love you!

Mommy, what are they doing to me!? It hurts! Please make them stop! It feels bad! Please, Mommy, please please help me! Make them stop!

Don't worry Mommy, I'm safe. I'm in heaven with the angels now. They told me what you did, and they said it's called an abortion.

Why, Mommy? Why did you do it? Don't you love me any more? Why did you get rid of me? I'm really, really, really sorry if I did something wrong, Mommy. I love you, Mommy! I love you with all of my heart. Why don't you love me? What did I do to deserve what they did to me? I want to live, Mommy! Please! It really, really hurts to see you not care about me, and not talk to me. Didn't I love you enough? Please say you'll keep me, Mommy! I want to live smile and watch the clouds and see your face and grow up and be a doctor. I don't want to be here, I want you to love me again! I'm really really really sorry if I did something wrong. I love you!

I love you, Mommy.

Every abortion is just…

One more heart that was stopped.

Two more eyes that will never see.

Two more hands that will never touch.

Two more legs that will never run.

One more mouth that will never speak.

If you’re against abortion, repost

Sunday 25 September 2011

Fly me to the moon 500 times .........

There is enough information in a pin head of human DNA , to write an amount of books ( each being approximately 300 pages in length ) that if stacked on top of one another , would reach to the moon and back 250 times or with no return tickets , 500 times . Now consider this , the moon is a quarter of a million , 250,000 miles away from the Earth . Now that is a lot of books and would fill a lot of libraries .
All in a PIN HEAD OF HUMAN DNA.

Thursday 22 September 2011

HOW RELIABLE ? ( The Bible , Gods Word ) The New Testament :

HOW RELIABLE ? ( The Bible , Gods Word ) The New Testament :
Many people scoff at The New Testament , which is the part of the Bible that records
the life , ministry , death and resurrection of Jesus Christ , the work and ministry of the first believers and leaders of the early church and Gods plan of reconciliation between His Creation and Himself . It is claimed , by some , that we can not trust what we read today in The Bible as being a true record of the events that happened 2000 years ago . Can the New Testament be compared to other historical manuscripts , that we have no problems with accepting as reliable and trustworthy , with a result that demonstrates the New Testament to be far more trustworthy and accurate when in comparison to them ?

The Bible , New Testament = In existence today - 5,300 Greek manuscripts - 10,000 Latin manuscripts - 9,300 ( other ) Ethiopian , Armenian , Slavic etc manuscripts = Approximately 24,000 in existence ( extant ) complete or partial manuscripts .
... ... The earliest , in existence ( extant ) copy of part of the New Testament = AD 125 = 25 years after the writing of the originals AD 45-100 .

Classical works of Antiquity :

The Greek Writer Homer : Homer's Iliad = In existence today - approx 650 manuscripts . The earliest , in existence ( extant ) copy of Homer's Iliad = 400bc = 500 years after the writing of the originals 900 bc .

Plato (tetralogies) , classical Greek philosopher, mathematician, student of Socrates = In existence today 7 manuscripts - The earliest , in existence ( extant ) copy of Plato's writings = AD 900 = 1200 years after the writing of the originals approximately 400 bc .

Herodtus (history) = In existence today 8 manuscripts - The earliest , in existence ( extant ) copy = AD 900 = 1300 years after the writing of the originals approximately 400 bc .

Tacitus ( Annals of Rome ) = In existence today 20 manuscripts - earliest copy = AD 1100 = 1000 years after being written = Originals AD 100 .

Pliny the younger (History) = In existence today 7 manuscripts - earliest copy = AD 850 = 750 years after being written = Originals AD 100 approximately .

Aristotle = In existence today 49 manuscripts - earliest copy = AD 1100 = 1400 years after being written = Originals approximately 350 bc .

Caesar = In existence today 10 manuscripts - earliest copy = AD 900 = 1000 years after being written = Originals approximately 100 bc .

There are other writings of a classical nature from Antiquity that we can also compare with the New Testament and the result would be the same as demonstrated with those used . The result , clearly , shows that if we dismiss the historical written accounts of the New Testament , on the basis of the manuscript evidence , then we would also have to dismiss great chunks of classical (literature) works of Antiquity .
We can rest assured that what we read in the New Testament ( the Bible ) today is what was written in the original manuscripts .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/just-for-you-reliable-historical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/bible-is-most-accurate-history-textbook.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-reliable-bible-gods-word-new.html
http://creation.com/6000-years
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/lawleseness-and-moral-decline-signs.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/jesus-christ-walks-on-water.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/passover-lamb-of-god-jesus-christ.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/signs-point-way.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/judgement-seat-of-christ-jesus.html

Tuesday 20 September 2011

TANYSTROPHEUS ( Dinosaur ) depicted on Roman Mosaic :

TANYSTROPHEUS ( Dinosaur ) depicted on Roman Mosaic :
Here we have a Roman Mosaic ( attached picture ), dated at 200ad , 1800 years ago . Amazingly , it must be asked " why is there a depiction of what seems to be a TANYSTROPHEUS ( Dinosaur ) on this Roman Mosaic which is nearly 2000 years old ?"
So , just how did the artist conjure up such creatures resembling what we know today as Dinosaurs if indeed dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago , considering man is not supposed to have arrived on the planet until approximately 60 something million years after dinosaurs supposedly went extinct ?
( millions of years are hypothetical years . And are part of the evolutionary interpretation of the evidences that we all have ) COULD IT BE THAT DINO'S AND MAN ACTUALLY LIVED ALONGSIDE ONE ANOTHER , and very recently ?
Did these artists witness these animals for themselves ?
Tanystropheus ( dinosaur ) pictures : http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Tanystropheus&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=5va&sa=G&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&channel=s&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ei=kfhwTpHjO4izhAeixZClCQ&ved=0CCkQsAQ&biw=1366&bih=580
-------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the ......Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/After-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2 ?

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/sauropods-apatosaurus-dinosaur-depicted.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/mosasaurus-dinosaur-depicted-on-ancient.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/native-american-indians-witness-dinos.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/if-my-memory-serves-me-well-dino.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/800-year-old-stegosaurus-so-how-come.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/tanystropheus-dinosaur-depicted-on.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/flying-winged-reptiles-serpentsaccount.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/evidence-for-watery-catastrophe.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/sauropods-apatosaurus-dinosaur-depicted.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/mosasaurus-dinosaur-depicted-on-ancient.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/native-american-indians-witness-dinos.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/if-my-memory-serves-me-well-dino.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/800-year-old-stegosaurus-so-how-come.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/tanystropheus-dinosaur-depicted-on.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/flying-winged-reptiles-serpentsaccount.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/evidence-for-watery-catastrophe.html

Friday 16 September 2011

IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME WELL ? Dino memories .

IF MY MEMORY SERVES ME WELL ?
Many cultures from around the world display and have within them a well grounded history of creatures , which , when on inspection , resemble to a great degree , what we today would understand as being Dinosaurs . The word dinosaur was first penned by Sir Richard Owen, FRS KCB (20 July 1804 – 18 December 1892) who was an English biologist, comparative anatomist and palaeontologist. Prior to the word dinosaur , ancient cultures and more modern cultures would use the word Dragon .
Atheistic evolutionary astronomer Carl Sagan took very seriously the accounts of encounters with dinosaurs ( dragons ) that have been recorded through the ages . He said : Carl Sagan , " The pervasiveness of dragon myths in the folk legends of many cultures is probably no accident" (Sagan, Carl, The Dragons of Eden, New York: Random House, 1977, p. 149).
The seriousness with which he took this matter is demonstrated by his attempt at trying to address this problem , for evolutionary theory , of man living alongside dinosaurs when man and dinosaurs are supposed to be , according to evolutionary theory , seperated by some sixty million years ( hypothetical years . And are part of the evolutionary interpretation of the evidences that we all have ). According to Carl Sagan the depictions of dinosaurs found globally spanning many cultures down the ages are just products of outward expressions of inherited memories from our primeval past .
Peter Dickinson : "Carl Sagan tried to account for the spread and consistency of dragon legends by saying that they are fossil memories of the time of the dinosaurs, come down to us through a general mammalian memory inherited from the early mammals, our ancestors, who had to compete with the great predatory lizards." (Dickinson, Peter, The Flight of Dragons, New York: Harper and Row, 1979, p. 127).
What a great scientific conclussion from Mr Carl Sagan who said the following regarding scientific discovery and how science works , whilst speaking at an annual convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Science ( AAAS ) in San Francisco -----Carl Sagan " The most fundamental axioms and conclusions may be challenged . " and the prevailing hypothesis " must survive confrontation with OBSERVATION ." " Appeals to authority ." he said , " are impermissible ." And " Experiments must be reproducible . "
Carl Sagan . Velikovsky's Challenge to Science cassette tape 186-74 , produced by the American Association for the Advancement of Science , Washington DC .

JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Aft...er-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2

Thursday 15 September 2011

SAUROPODS / APATOSAURUS ( Dinosaur ) depicted on ancient cylinder seal ?

SAUROPODS / APATOSAURUS ( Dinosaur ) depicted on ancient cylinder seal ?
An ancient ( Egyptian ) Mesopotamian cylinder seal , dated at 3300 BC. (Moortgart, Anton, The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia, 1969, plate 292.) seems to be displaying Sauropod or Apatosaurus like dinosaurs . Take a look at the artist picture on the right of a single Apatosaurus , which is an artist conception from an Apatosaurus skeleton , now compare it to the ancient seal depiction on the left . The similarities between th......ese two depictions are very striking . The legs and feet on the Egyptian art seem to fit the sauropods better .....Sauropod pictures http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Sauropod+pictures&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=KPG&sa=G&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&channel=s&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ei=U8RvTt2FJoXqOd__rYUJ&ved=0CBwQsAQ&biw=1366&bih=580
Apatosaurus pictures .....http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=oCG&sa=G&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&channel=s&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&source=univ&ei=S8FvTtPXDc_oOaP9hJoJ&ved=0CCYQsAQ&biw=1366&bih=580&q=Apatosaurus.+pictures&orq=Apatosaurus.++pictures
The head displays the biggest difference . The artists depiction of the Cartilage forming the shape of a frill or ears may be stylized or accurate ( as there is no way to know from the skeletons we have today). The skill with which the egyptian artist has captured the musculature of the animal is demonstrated with stunning realism.
It must be asked , where did the artist or how did the artist conjure up such an accurate image of what we today call dinosaurs ?
The question must be asked " how could artists decorating an ancient Egyptian seal know what a dinosaur ( SAUROPODS / APATOSAURUS ) looked like , when dino skeletons have only begun to be assembled during the past two hundred years and we are told they died ...out over 60 million years ago ? ( hypothetical years . And are part of the evolutionary interpretation of the evidences that we all have ) COULD IT BE THAT DINO'S AND MAN ACTUALLY LIVED ALONGSIDE ONE ANOTHER , and very recently ?
Did these artists witness these animals for themselves ?
-------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the ......Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/After-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2

Tuesday 13 September 2011

MOSASAURUS ( Dinosaur ) depicted on ancient urn ?

MOSASAURUS ( Dinosaur/sea creature/aquatic lizard ) depicted on ancient urn ?
So , how come there is a MOSASAURUS like creature depicted on an urn which is approximately 2500 years old ?
Take a close look at the picture attached , an ancient urn from Caria , which was located in Asia Minor (Turkey). The artifact is dated from 530bc , that is 2500 years ago . We see on the urn pictures of several known sea creatures a seal , octopus and dolphin BUT more interestingly we see what appears to be a MOSASAURUS . The characteristics of this sea creature with the positioning of the jaws , big eye's , large teeth and flippers clearly match a MOSASAURUS skeleton very well.
If you take a look at artist drawings of a MOSASAURUS you will not fail to see the resemblance . http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=mosasaurus&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=lFD&sa=G&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&channel=s&prmd=ivns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ei=VihtTvOtEcO3hAf6v5SDDA&ved=0CDoQsAQ&biw=1366&bih=580
(This artifact is described in Thomas H. Carpenter's 1991 book Art and Myth in Ancient Greece: A Handbook)
The question must be asked " how could artists decorating a 2500 year old urn know what a (Dinosaur/sea creature/aquatic lizard ) MOSASAURUS looked like , when dinosaur skeletons have only begun to be assembled during the past two hundred years and we are told they died out over 60 million years ago ? ( hypothetical years . And are part of the evolutionary interpretation of the evidences that we all have ) COULD IT BE THAT DINO'S AND MAN ACTUALLY LIVED ALONGSIDE ONE ANOTHER , and very recently ?
Did these artists witness these creatures for themselves ?
--------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the ......Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/After-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/chinese-lunar-year.html

Sunday 11 September 2011

No Adam , No Sin , No need for Jesus Christ and No Salvation ?

The following statement should make those who are tinkering with the idea that you can marry The Word of God with the atheistic evolutionary paradigm THINK AGAIN :
No Adam , No Sin , No need for Jesus Christ and No Salvation . This evolutionary paradigm as well as clearly wrong scientifically is clearly an attempt to do away with Him ...who created all things . Just like Lyell tried to remove Moses from the rocks so the evolutinary deception continues in trying to remove the Creator from His Creation .
....srh
The most devastating thing though that biology did to Christianity was the discovery of biological evolution. Now that we know that Adam and Eve never were real people the central myth of Christianity is destroyed. If there never was an Adam and Eve there never was an original sin. If there never was an original sin there is no need of salvation. If there is no need of salvation there is no need of a saviour. And I submit that puts Jesus, historical or otherwise, into the ranks of the unemployed. I think that evolution is absolutely the death knell of Christianity.
Frank Zindler, American atheist, in a debate with William Craig, Atheism vs Christianity video, Zondervan, 1996

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/jesus-christ-came-to-fulfill-judaic-law.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/jesus-christ-walks-on-water.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/proclamation-of-gospel-good-news-of.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/jesus-christ-first-coming-achieves.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/signs-pointing-to-second-coming-of.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/no-excuses.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/lawleseness-and-moral-decline-signs.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/no-adam-no-sin-no-need-for-jesus-christ.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/jesus-christ-would-die-for-our-sins.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/jesus-christ-is-answer-to-genesis.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/jesus-christ-guilty-of-being-first.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/napolean-said-of-jesus-christ.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/jesus-christ-will-come-with-great-power.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/jesus-christ-walks-on-water.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/passover-lamb-of-god-jesus-christ.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/just-for-you-reliable-historical.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/will-you-recognize-truth.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/jesus-wept.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/signs-point-way.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/judgement-seat-of-christ-jesus.html

Saturday 10 September 2011

So , how come there is a stegosaur like creature carved on a building which is 800 years old ?

800 year old STEGOSAURUS :
So , how come there is a stegosaur like creature carved on a building which is 800 years old ?
Well , in the jungles of Angkor , Cambodia there are temples and palaces from the Khmer civilization , app 1200 ad. . One of the temples , Ta Prohm http://www.canbypublications.com/siemreap/temples/temp-taprohm.htm has many stone statues and reliefs. Most of the gray sandstone... is covered with ornate, detailed carvings. These show familiar animals like monkeys, deer , water buffalo , parrots and lizards. BUT INTERESTINGLY , one column displays an intricate carving of a stegosaur-like creature. The question must be asked " how could artists , 800 years ago , decorating this Buddhist temple know what a dinosaur looked like , when dino skeletons have , knowingly , only begun to be assembled during the past two hundred years ?"......And we are told dinosaurs died out over 60 million years ago . ( hypothetical years . And are part of the evolutionary interpretation of the evidences that we all have ) COULD IT BE THAT DINO'S AND MAN ACTUALLY LIVED ALONGSIDE ONE ANOTHER , and very recently ? Did these artists witness these animals for themselves ?
--------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Aft...er-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2

Friday 9 September 2011

Intelligence the CAUSE of design denied ...............................

Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA which is a double helix structure , wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.”

Crick, F., What mad pursuit: a Personal View of Scientific Discovery, Sloan Foundation Science, London, 1988, p. 138.

---------------
Amazing , a willful deliberate refusal to admit , not to themselves as they do recognize intelligent design within complex living organisms , and proclaim an intelligent cause for what they observe within the world they live .
.....srh
-------------
Romans 1:19-23 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.

Tuesday 6 September 2011

HOMO HABILIS .Put together from the waste bin of ape and human fossil bits .
EVOLUTIONARY DECEPTION . What , another ? Yes , another .
Are you under the impression that there are ape like humans , that supposedly show a link to our past and are part of our common ancestor tree ? Well you would not be alone in thinking this because that is what we have been indoctrinated to believe...... . The main stream media is fast to lock onto anything that is banded about claiming to be a link to our origins . One of these supposed missing links (Although there is no such thing as a missing link in reality , and logicaly how can something be missing if it has never been there ?) HOMO HABILIS , was one of them ,put together from the waste bin of ape and human fossils bits . THE LIE CONTINUES .
The usual evolutionary story upset (summary)
The most common ‘neat’ story of human evolution has australopithecines (such as ‘Lucy’) evolving into Homo habilis, which evolves into Homo erectus, which evolves into Homo sapiens. Australopithecines have no clear connection to humans, but museums, popular articles and text-books for schools and universities commonly claimed that Homo habilis linked them with humans (Homo erectus and Homo sapiens). While one camp of paleontologists argued that Homo habilis was not a valid taxon, being a waste bin of mixed ape and human fossil bits, other evolutionists clung to H. habilis as being valid. Now even those who still claim it was valid are putting it aside. That effectively leaves a gaping hole in the story of human evolution, with nothing left to link humans with apes.

Saturday 3 September 2011

If Darwin could have foreseen coming scientific developments........

We now know that if Darwin could have foreseen coming scientific developments, he would have had good reason to be concerned that his theory might one day be proved wrong. In particular, Gregor Mendel had not yet established and published his work on the laws of heredity and genetics, which said that the characteristics of offspring are passed on from parents according to precise mathematical ratios and do not derive from chance random processes in what Darwin called ‘blending inheritance’. James Joule, R.J.E. Clausius, and Lord Kelvin were only just developing the concepts of thermodynamics, the first law of which states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed (so the present universe could not have created itself), and the second law of which says that the universe is proceeding in a downward degenerating direction of increasing disorganization (so things overall do not of themselves become more organized with time). Louis Pasteur was just beginning his famous experiments which showed that life (even microbial life) comes from life, not from non-life. The mathematical laws of probability, which show that the odds of life’s occurring by chance are effectively zero, had not yet been applied to the theory of evolution. Molecular biology, with its revelation that the cell is so enormously complex that it could not possibly have been formed by chance, had not yet commenced. The fossil record had not yet been investigated sufficiently for palaeontologists to be able to say, as they now do, that chains of intermediate ‘links’ do not exist. Any one of these concepts or laws, if known to Charles Darwin at the time he was writing his Origin (1856–59), would have been enough to torpedo his ideas; taken all together they kill the theory of evolution stone dead!