Be The Voice - Gen1Rev22

Sunday, 10 June 2012

HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APES AND HUMANS : With no answers WHY .

HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN APES AND HUMANS : With no answers WHY .
Elaine Morgan, an evolutionary paleoanthropologist, makes the following confession with reference to the vast chasm between man and ape :
Elaine Morgan :
Four of the most outstanding mysteries about humans are: 1) why do they walk on two legs? 2) why have they lost their fur...? 3) why have they developed such large brains? 4) why did they learn to speak?The orthodox answers to these questions are: 1) 'We do not yet know;' 2) 'We do not yet know;' 3) 'We do not yet know;' 4) 'We do not yet know.' The list of questions could be considerably lengthened without affecting the monotony of the answers .
Elaine Morgan, The Scars of Evolution, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994, p. 5.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/false-evolutionary-jumping-claim-apes.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/deception-and-illusion-is-still-being.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/recent-common-ancestors-for-all.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/large-differences-in-dna-not-small-ones.html

Friday, 8 June 2012

Observable and demonstratable creation all around us :

Robert Locke, Discovering Archeology :
"The search for human ancestors gives more heat than light," quoting the confession of evolutionary paleoanthropologist Tim White:
We're all frustrated by "all the questions we haven't been able to answer."
Robert Locke, "Family Fights," Discovering Archaeology, July/August 1999, p. 36-39 .
---------...------
HERE IT IS ...........LISTEN , BE VERY SILENT JUST IN CASE YOU MISS IT THIS COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE SSSssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhh now come closer , a little closer still , bit more . Are you ready ? Ok here goes ........................................
" IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH ."
" GOD CREATED MAN IN THE IMAGE OF GOD , MALE AND FEMALE HE CREATED THEM "
" FROM THE BEGINNING MAN HAS BEEN MAN AND WOMAN HAS BEEN WOMAN ."
There you go , now go and do your testable , repeatable and observable science in the light of these truths as the GREAT SCIENTISTS did and do and you will get closer to Him who created all things .
CREATION REVEALS HIM .
Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/fully-human-from-beginning.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/fossils-reject-darwins-tree-of-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/fossils-say-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/origins-of-vertebrates.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/dreams-and-visions-for-evolutionary.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/green-machine.html

Thursday, 7 June 2012

JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?

JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the ......Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans every tribe and nation globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as DINOSAURS .

Tuesday, 5 June 2012

RELIGION......Who is your God ?

Who is your God ? Man can clearly see , hear , touch , smell and taste the creation that he inhabits . He is without excuse for not worshipping The True Creator of The Universe .
Dr Broughton Knox, former principal of Moore College, denounced evolution :
‘The doctrine of God the Creator is vivid throughout the pages of Scripture. The gods of the nations are not creator gods and, as the interesting ...little Aramaic insertion in Jeremiah puts it, the gods that did not create the world will perish, as indeed they have. In our own times idolatry, which was a universal substitute for the Creator God, has been replaced by the widely held theory of evolution. Both are substitutes for the concept of the Creator God. Just as the ancients and the heathen today deified and worshipped the creature as the creator, modelling images of man or birds or animals or reptiles and worshipping these, so for western secular man the modern theory of evolution deifies nature, and acknowledges it as creator of all we see around us. All the beauty and intricacy and all the marvellous arrangements of the natural world are supposed to have been evolved by a thoughtless, purposeless, mechanical operation of nature, and in this way the God who made the world is as effectively shut out of the minds of those who are enjoying the blessings of His creation as He was by the false religions of idolatry. Just as the idolators could not see the foolishness, indeed the stupidity, of worshipping gods of wood and stone, which have no life nor purpose nor mind, so modern believers in the theory of evolution cannot see the foolishness of that theory, which not only lacks evidence to support it, but also runs counter to such evidence of origins as is available. Nevertheless, this false worldview is being indoctrinated into children in the schools with the aid of public money and placarded in natural history museums as though it were the only explanation of the world around us, while those who criticize and expose the theory receive the same intense religious hostility as did those who denounced idolatry in earlier days. The Bible says that if we refuse to have the Creator God in our mind, God gives us up to a reprobate mind.’
Dr D. Broughton Knox, The Everlasting God, Lancer Books, Homebush West, pp. 30–31, 1988. .......

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-truth.html

Monday, 4 June 2012

HUGE SERPENTS observed and recorded by the trader and explorer MARCO POLO (1254A.D.– 1324 A.D.)

HUGE SERPENTS observed and recorded by the trader and explorer MARCO POLO (1254A.D.– 1324 A.D.) Could these be eyewitness accounts of what we today call dinosaurs ?
Marco Polo traveled through Asia , Persia , China and Indonesia over a period of some twenty years , between 1271-1298 . Men like Christopher Columbus were inspired due to him resulting in them exploring the world .
THE TRAVELS OF MARCO POLO is the written record of Marco Polo , his travels and adventures . We find within this written record a detailed account of what Marco Polo describes and reports as being "HUGE SERPENTS". From these accounts it seems that Marco Polo was describing what we would call "dinosaurs".Take a read for yourself: The travels of Marco Polo , part 2 , chapter 40 .
Marco Polo .......
"Leaving the city of Yachi, and traveling ten days in a westerly direction, you reach the province of Karazan, which is also the name of the chief city . Here are seen huge serpents, ten paces in length (about 30 feet), and ten spans (about 8 feet) girt of the body. At the fore part, near the head, they have two short legs, having three claws like those of a tiger, with eyes larger than a forepenny loaf (pane da quattro denari) and very glaring."

The jaws are wide enough to swallow a man, the teeth are large and sharp, and their whole appearance is so formidable, that neither man, nor any kind of animal can approach them without terror. Others are met with of a smaller size, being eight, six, or 5 paces long; and the following method is used for taking them. In the day-time, by reason of great heat, they lurk in caverns, from whence, at night, they issue to seek their food, and whatever beast they meet with and can lay hold of, whether tiger, wolf, or any other, they devour;

"After which they drag themselves towards some lake, spring of water, or river, in order to drink. By their motion in this way along the shore, and their vast weight, they make a deep impression, as if a heavy beam had been drawn along the sands. Those whose employment is to hunt them observe the track by which they are most frequently accustomed to go, and fix into the ground several pieces of wood, armed with sharp iron spikes, which they cover with sand in such a manner as not to be perceptible.

When therefore the animals make their way towards the places they usually haunt, they are wounded by these instruments, and speedily killed. The crows, as soon as they perceive them to be dead, set up to scream; and this serves as a signal to the hunters, who advance the spot, and proceed to separate the skin from the flesh, taking care immediately to secure the gall, which is most highly esteemed in medicine.

In cases of the bite of a mad dog, a penny weight of it, dissolved in wine, is administered. It is also useful in accelerating parturition, when the labor pains of women have come on. A small quantity of it being applied to carbuncles, pustules, or other eruptions on the body, they are presently dispersed; and it is efficacious in many other complaints.

The flesh also of the animal is sold at a dear rate, being thought to have a higher flavor than other kinds of meat, and by all persons it is esteemed a delicacy." (The Travels of Marco Polo, © 1948,Book 2, Chapter XL, pg. 185-186)
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/12410
------------------------------ ---------
COULD IT BE THAT DINO'S AND MAN ACTUALLY LIVED ALONGSIDE ONE ANOTHER , and very recently ?
Did these artists witness these animals for themselves ?
-------------
JUST WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF MAN AND DINOSAUR CO-EXISTED ?
Louis Jacobs , former president of the society of Vertebrate Paleontology ......
"Such an association (man and dinosaur) would dispel an Earth with vast antiquity . The entire history of creation , including the day of rest , could be accommodated in the seven biblical days of the ......Genesis myth . EVOLUTION WOULD BE VANQUISHED ."

Mr Jacobs does not hold to the biblical worldview , this is obvious by his calling the Genesis account myth , but he clearly understands that if man and dinosaurs co-existed then it is the final nail in the coffin for the Evolutionary Paradigm .
From the evidence that is available , which spans many tribes and nations globally , it is obvious that man and dinosaurs co-existed . The very book (Bible , Word of God ) he attempts to claim as myth contains eyewitness accounts of what are clearly known by us today as "DINOSAURS" .
A great book for anybody searching out evidence for the co existence of man and what we call today dinosuars then the following book by Bill Cooper is a great read . http://www.amazon.co.uk/After-flood-Post-flood-History-Europe/dp/187436740X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513429&sr=8-1 Also Dragons and Dinosaurs by Darek Isaacs . http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dragons-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Darek-Isaacs/dp/088270477X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1304513756&sr=1-2

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/dinos-embedded-in-chinese-culture.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/chinese-lunar-year.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/sauropods-apatosaurus-dinosaur-depicted.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/mosasaurus-dinosaur-depicted-on-ancient.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/native-american-indians-witness-dinos.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/if-my-memory-serves-me-well-dino.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/younger-world-evidence-for-speed-at.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/800-year-old-stegosaurus-so-how-come.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/09/tanystropheus-dinosaur-depicted-on.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/flying-winged-reptiles-serpentsaccount.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/evidence-for-watery-catastrophe.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/chinese-lunar-year-year-of-dragon.html

Saturday, 2 June 2012

Science needs a literal interpretation of the Bible :

One of the many ways that God ( The Supernatural Creator of The Universe ) has revealed Himself is through His Word . These 66 books that make up what we call The Bible , have been the inspiration and guidance into Scientific study for centuries . True Science , that which is testable , observable and repeatable ( the empirical method... ) was and always will be understood fully by a literal interpretation of His Word .
--------------------
Stephen Snobelen, Assistant Professor of History of Science and Technology,
University of King’s College, Halifax, Canada
Here is a final paradox. Recent work on early modern science has demonstrated a direct (and positive) relationship between the resurgence of the Hebraic, literal exegesis of the Bible in the Protestant Reformation, and the rise of the empirical method in modern science. I’m not referring to wooden literalism, but the sophisticated literal-historical hermeneutics that Martin Luther and others (including Newton) championed. It was, in part, when this method was transferred to science, when students of nature moved on from studying nature as symbols, allegories and metaphors to observing nature directly in an inductive and empirical way, that modern science was born. In this, Newton also played a pivotal role. As strange as it may sound, science will forever be in the debt of millenarians and biblical literalists.
Isaac Newton and Apocalypse Now: a response to Tom Harpur’s Newton’s strange bedfellows; A longer version of the letter published in the Toronto Star, 26 February 2004.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/falling-into-understanding.html http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/evolutionary-religion-oh-but-it-is.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/evolution-is-religion.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/get-to-children.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/falling-into-understanding.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/darwins-vain-theory-charles-hatton.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/i-was-taught-to-share-but-there-are.html

Friday, 1 June 2012

SO WHAT PURPOSE WOULD AN INTERMEDIATE LUNG SERVE ?

SO WHAT PURPOSE WOULD AN INTERMEDIATE LUNG SERVE ?
To live , a creature has to keep breathing, a reversal of the structure of its lungs with a change of design would be fatal to the creature. A creature whose lungs do not work will die within a few minutes.

Michael Denton :
Just how such an utterly different respiratory system could have evolved gradually from the standard vertebrate design is fantastically difficult to envisage, especially bearing in mind that the maintenance of respiratory function is absolutely vital to the life of an organism to the extent that the slightest malfunction leads to death within minutes. Just as the feather cannot function as an organ of flight until the hooks and barbules are coadapted to fit together perfectly, so the avian lung cannot function as an organ of respiration until the parabronchi system which permeates it and the air sac system which guarantees the parabronchi their air supply are both highly developed and able to function together in a perfectly integrated manner.
Michael Denton, A Theory in Crisis, Adler & Adler, 1986, pp. 211-212.

John Ruben :
The earliest stages in the derivation of the avian abdominal air sac system from a diaphragm-ventilating ancestor would have necessitated selection for a diaphragmatic hernia in taxa transitional between theropods and birds. Such a debilitating condition would have immediately compromised the entire pulmonary ventilatory apparatus and seems unlikely to have been of any selective advantage .
J. A. Ruben, T. D. Jones, N. R. Geist, and W. J. Hillenius, "Lung Structure And Ventilation in Theropod Dinosaurs and Early Birds," Science, vol. 278, p. 1267

Michael Denton :
Just how such a different respiratory system could have evolved gradually from the standard vertebrate design without some sort of direction is, again, very difficult to envisage, especially bearing in mind that the maintenance of respiratory function is absolutely vital to the life of the organism. Moreover, the unique function and form of the avian lung necessitates a number of additional unique adaptations during avian development. As H. R. Dunker, one of the world's authorities in this field, explains, because first, the avian lung is fixed rigidly to the body wall and cannot therefore expand in volume and, second, because of the small diameter of the lung capillaries and the resulting high surface tension of any liquid within them, the avian lung cannot be inflated out of a collapsed state as happens in all other vertebrates after birth. The air capillaries are never collapsed as are the alveoli of other vertebrate species; rather, as they grow into the lung tissue, the parabronchi are from the beginning open tubes filled with either air or fluid.114

Michael Denton :
The avian lung brings us very close to answering Darwin's challenge: "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."

EVOLUTION ....FAILED .
.....srh
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/evolution-cannot-account-for-structure.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html

Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Speculations about how organisms may have arisen is not required by doctors ......

Dr Skell wrote, “It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers ….”
Skell, P.S., The Dangers Of Overselling Evolution; Focusing on Darwin and his theory doesn't further scientific progress, Forbes magazine, 23 Feb 2009;
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/23/evolution-creation-debate-biology-opinions-contributors_darwin.html.
-----------
How many times have we heard that we need to understand biology in the light of evolutionary paradigm ? How many times have we heard that understanding the biology of complex living organisms through an evolutionary mindset has led to many medical breakthrough's ? And claims of a similar standing in an attempt to claim that The evolutionary paradigm is making sense of our world .Well it seems to me that those who are in the know are not in agreement with those who make these claims .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/biological-research-in-light-without.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/evolution-not-taken-into-account.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/only-biology-that-has-proceeded-in.html

Sunday, 27 May 2012

No insect in betweeners ...........

Friday, 25 May 2012

WHY such a BIG UNIVERSE containing so much MASS ?

WHY such a BIG UNIVERSE containing so much MASS ?
There are many who argue against an intelligent designer and creator of the Universe . One of the questions put forward
questioning an intelligent source to the Universe is " If God created man and also designed the Universe why did He create billions of other stars in the Universe ?"
But recent recent studies have demonstrated why the Universe is so vast ..............
----------
We now know that the overall mass of the universe is yet another one of those key factors necessary for life on Earth to be possible . With too much or too little mass in the universe the universe would be devoid of elements such as carbon , oxygen and nitrogen , which are crucial for the sustenance of life . Therefore , it appears that God created billions of stars so that life could exist on Earth .
Dr Hugh Ross , " Where did the Universe come from ? New scientific evidence for the existence of God ." Presented in South Barrington , Illinois , April 16 , 1994 .
----------
It must be noted that Dr Hugh Ross is a theistic evolutionary . BUT this does not negate what he says here .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html

Thursday, 24 May 2012

"Maybe some of us aren’t meant to survive, maybe some of us are meant to KILL OURSELVES….........."

"Maybe some of us aren’t meant to survive, maybe some of us are meant to KILL OURSELVES….........."
The theory of DEATH ( darwinian evolution ) offers no hope , but that which will catch us all in the end . This theory of death also promotes premature death , brought on by suicide . The theory of death will use any deception in order to propogate it's cull of Man who has been Created in The Image of God .
GENESIS 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. .
-----------
Gerard: ‘ ... I think that some people may have an inability to cope, and maybe this might sound a bit extreme, but that might be Darwinian theory, the Darwin theory of survival of the fittest. Maybe some of us aren’t meant to survive, maybe some of us are meant to kill ourselves …
‘There’s too many people in the world as it is. Maybe it is survival of the fittest, maybe some of us are meant to just give up, and maybe that would help the species.’
ABC (Australia) radio, Life Matters with Norman Swan, 4 May 2000: ‘Black Dog Days—The Experience and Treatment of Depression’
----------
Real LIFE can only be found in JESUS CHRIST ..........JOHN 14:6 Jesus told him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.
JOHN 1:4 In him was life, and that life was the light of men.
JOHN 11:25 Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies ."

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-truth.html

Wednesday, 23 May 2012

THE ORIGIN OF FLIGHT........... ACCORDING TO EVOLUTIONISTS :

How , as land-dwelling creatures, did reptiles ever come to fly .This is an issue which has resulted in much speculation among evolutionists.
Two main theories are:
a) ancestors (reptiles) of birds descended to ground from trees. the reptiles lived in the treetops and came to possess wings gradually as they jumped from one branch to another. ARBOREAL THEORY.
b) Birds progressed to the air from the land. CURSORIAL (or "running") theory .
These theories are speculative interpretations, with no evidence to support either . Evolutionists SIMPLY IMAGINE that the evidence exists.

Professor John Ostrom, head of the Geology Department at Yale University, who proposed the cursorial theory :

NO FOSSIL evidence exists of any pro-avis. It is a PURE HYPOTHETICAL pre-bird, but one that must have existed.
John Ostrom, "Bird Flight: How Did It Begin?," American Scientist, January-February 1979, vol. 67, p. 47.
TOTAL IMAGINATION . The stuff fairytales are made from .

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/flap-them-arms-you-will-not-see-results.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/08/man-made-evolution-v-godly-morality.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/fully-human-from-beginning.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/fossils-reject-darwins-tree-of-life.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/fossils-say-no.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/origins-of-vertebrates.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/10/dreams-and-visions-for-evolutionary.html

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE :

THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE :
The thought of The Universe having a beginning has struck fear into the hearts of many evolutionary scientists . For many centuries past , the debate as to whether or not The Universe had a beginning has raged on . BUT , why such a big deal ? The big deal will certainly be in the hand of those who say their is a Creator of The Universe if it can be demonstrated that indeed The Universe had a beginning , that is the big deal . There are many scientific evidences now demonstrating that INDEED The Universe had a beginning .....A moment when TIME , MATTER and ENERGY came into existence . Many still try to wriggle out of this event and dream up many non demonstratable theories because they wish to deliberately reject a CREATOR of The Universe and deny where the evidence is leading .
Alexander Vilenkin, Professor of Physics and Director of the Institute of Cosmology at Tufts University..........states , concerning the reality of the beginning of The Universe and how this will have to be faced by those who can not even consider the thought .
----------
Alexander Vilenkin :
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape, they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning (Many Worlds in One [New York: Hill and Wang, 2006], p.176).

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/first-star.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cosmological-foolishnessnot-logical.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cold-dark-matter-let-us-just-pretend.html

Sunday, 20 May 2012

Evolution cannot account for the structure of avian lungs.

AVIAN LUNGS :
Evolution cannot account for the structure of avian lungs, .
LAND DWELLING CREATURES ( Carnivorous Theropods ..Dinosaurs ) air flow is bidirectional. Inhaling, air travels through the passages in the lungs (bronchial tubes), ending in tiny air sacs (alveoli). Exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide takes place here. Exhaling..., this used air makes its way back and finds its way out of the lung by the same route.
BIRDS air is unidirectional. New air comes in one end, and used air goes at the other end. Special air sacs all along the passages between them, air flows in one direction through the avian lung. Therefore birds are able to take in air nonstop. This satisfies birds' high energy requirements.

Michael Denton in his book A Theory in Crisis:
In the case of birds, the major bronchi break down into tiny tubes which permeate the lung tissue. These so-called parabronchi eventually join up together again, forming a true circulatory system so that air flows in one direction through the lungs. ...[T]he structure of the lung in birds and the overall functioning of the respiratory system is quite unique. No lung in any other vertebrate species is known which in any way approaches the avian system. Moreover, it is identical in all essential details in birds as diverse as humming birds, ostriches and hawks.
Michael Denton, A Theory in Crisis, Adler & Adler, 1986, pp. 210-211

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/so-what-purpose-would-intermediate-lung.html

Saturday, 19 May 2012

Earth Geology explained by Global Flood :

"COME ON , THE MAJORITY OF GEOLOGIST'S ACCEPT THE EONS OF TIME INTERPRETATION FOR THE ROCKS ............SURELY ????????????? "
It is called evolutionary specs . funding , philosophical and ideological reasons . And the need to rid the science of Moses . Once the evolutionary proponents accept the rocks do not demonstrate and can not be explained as having been set down over billions of years then they have lost their billions of years , and they want their billions of years for their philosophical and ideological belief system . In many instances there are probably many more geologist's who are questioning the evolutionary timelines etc but for fear of reprisals , as can be demonstrated , they stay silent .
Clear a priori bias placed upon the geological evidence :

James Hutton ( 1785 )
‘the past history of our globe MUST BE EXPLAINED by what can be seen to be happening now … No powers are to be employed that are not natural to the globe, NO ACTION TO BE ADMITTED except those of which we know the principle’ ( caps added )
Hutton, J., ‘Theory of the Earth’, a paper (with the same title of his 1795 book) communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and published in Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1785; cited with approval in Holmes, A., Principles of Physical Geology, 2nd edition, Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd., Great Britain, pp. 43–44, 1965. FREE SCIENCE FROM MOSES .

Charles Lyell's agenda was to.... “free the science from Moses”.
Bailey, E , British men of science: Charles Lyell, Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, London, Great Britain, 1962 p. 77-78. ....

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/earth-privileged-planet.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2010/12/what-is-truth.html

Friday, 18 May 2012

Darwinian tree planted in stony ground :

Darwinian tree planted in stony ground :
During the 1990s, research into the genetic codes of living things made worse the dillemma faced by the theory of evolution in this regard. In these experiments, "ribosomal RNA" (rRNA) sequences were compared. From the findings, evolutionist scientists goal was to establish an "evolutionary tree......." BUT , they were disappointed by the results.

-------

French biologists Hervé Philippe and Patrick Forterre, "with more and more sequences available, it turned out that most protein phylogenies contradict each other as well as the rRNA tree."
Hervé Philippe and Patrick Forterre, "The Rooting of the Universal Tree of Life is Not Reliable," Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol 49, 1999, p. 510.
Science, vol. 283, 1999, p. 2027
------
No consistent organismal phylogeny has emerged from the many individual protein phylogenies so far produced. Phylogenetic incongruities can be seen everywhere in the universal tree, from its root to the major branchings within and among the various [groups] to the makeup of the primary groupings themselves.
Carl Woese, "The Universel Ancestor," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, (1998) p. 6854.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/naturalism-tricks-us-into-believing-it.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/03/design-of-feather-hooks-evolution.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/01/design-or-chance-spiders.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/believing-that-pure-chance-can-produce.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/possibilities-are-endless.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/wishful-thinking.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/dnaultimate-information-storage-system.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/04/tailor-made-universe-suits-you-sir.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/what-purpose-is-color-of-my-skin.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/eye-can-see-you.html
http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/information-within-dna.html

Thursday, 17 May 2012

KNOW the difference between TRUE SCIENCE and FALSE SCIENCE :

KNOW the difference between TRUE SCIENCE and FALSE SCIENCE:
Repeatedly , again and again , we here " Science does not need a Creator , God is unscientific . " But , what those who make these claims are forgetting to mention is "what kind of science does not need a Creator and what kind of science makes God unscientific ?" Well , the kind of science making this claim is evolutionary science , the evolutionary paradigm is purely naturalistic and materialistic processes all by themselves over eons of time , with no goal directed purpose , producing what we observe within and including our Universe . This , is clearly , a deliberate rejection of a creator and would not need a Creator and would make God unscientific . BUT , modern science , the kind of science that is testable , repeatable and observable that enables us to study our Universe and all it contains clearly demonstrates ORDER , GOAL DIRECTED PURPOSES and COMPLEXITY . This true science has it's origins in men coming to the conclusion that there must be a creator and He has revealed Himself in His Creation .
-------------
C.S. LEWIS
‘Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Legislator. In most modern scientists this belief has died: it will be interesting to see how long their confidence in uniformity survives it. Two significant developments have already appeared—the hypothesis of a lawless sub-nature, and the surrender of the claim that science is true. We may be living nearer than we suppose to the end of the Scientific Age.’
Lewis, C.S., Miracles: a preliminary study, Collins, London, p. 110, 1947.

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/science-owes-its-origins-to-act-of.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/literal-interpretation-of-bible-is-and.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/05/now-that-is-not-science.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/do-not-contradict-paradigm.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/11/bedtime-storytelling.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/06/word-of-greatest-scientist.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/real-myth-makers.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/07/get-closer-to-god.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/02/lyell-agenda.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2011/12/non-measurable-ramblings.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/02/what-do-leaders-say.html

http://gen1rev22.blogspot.com/2012/01/deceptive-interpretation-of-evidence.html